Predicting integrated protein nutritional quality Part 1: Amino acid availability corrected amino acid score and nitrogen balance data fitted to linear and non-linear models for test proteins

Nutrition Research

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1791-1805

  Tuan, Yu Hui ^a   Phillips, R Dixon ^b   Dove, C Robert ^c  

^a TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE INSTITUTE OF NORTHERN TAIWAN   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid availability; Linear nonlinear models; Protein digestibility

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CASEIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIETARY INTAKE; NITROGEN BALANCE; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN QUALITY; SORGHUM;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0033485662     PISSN: 02715317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5317(99)00129-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bressani, R. Human assays and applications. Ch. 5, In: Bodwell, CE, ed. Evaluation of Proteins for Humans, Westport, CT: AVI Publishing Company, Inc., 1977: 81-118.
2. Elkowicz, K, Sosulski, FW. Antinutritive factors in eleven legumes and their air-classified protein and starch fractions. J. Food Sci. 1982; 47:1301-1304.
3. Finley, JW. Effects of processing on proteins: An overview, Ch. 1. In: Phillips, RD, Finley, JW, eds. Protein Quality and the Effects of Processing, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989: 1-7.
4. Miller, ER, Ullrey, DE. The pig as a model for human nutrition. In: Olson, R.E, ed. Annual Review of Nutrition, Vol. 7, Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc, 1987: 361-382.
5. Sauer W, Dugan M, De Lange K, Imbeah M, Mosenthin R. Considerations in methodology for the determination of amino acid digestibilities in feed stuffs for pigs. In: Friedman M, ed. Absorption and Utilization of Amino Acids, Vol. III Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1989: 217-230.
6. Holmes JHG, Bayley HS, Leadbeater, PA, Horney, F.D. Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. Br J Nutr 1974; 32:479-489.
7. Just B, Jorgensen H, Fernandez JA. The digestive capacity of the caecum-colon and the value of the nitrogen absorbed from the hind gut for protein synthesis in pigs. Br J Nutr 1981; 46:209-219.
8. Dansky LM, Hill FW. Application of the chromic oxide indicator method to balance studies with growing chickens. J Nutr 1952; 47:449-459.
9. Anonymous. Energy and protein requirements. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series No. 724. Geneva, Switzerland, FAO, WHO, and the United Nations University, 1985
10. Bressani R, Viteri F, Elias LG. The usefulness of results with human beings in standardizing rat assays. Ch. 19, In: Porter JW, Rolls BA eds. Proteins in Human Nutrition New York: Academic Press, 1973: 293-316.
11. Young VR, Scrimshaw NS, Bier DM. Whole body protein and amino acid metabolism: Relation to protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. J Agric Food Chem 1981; 29;3:440-447.
12. Allison JB, Anderson JA. The relation between absorbed nitrogen, nitrogen balance and biological value of protein in adult dogs. J Nutr 1945; 29:413-420.
13. Flodin NW, Mercer LP, Morgan, P.H. Protein quality assay by rat growth based on a saturation kinetics model. Nutr Rep Int 1977; 16:1-9.
14. Mercer LP, Gustafson JM. A new protein quality evaluation index based on growth response of rats. J Nutr 1984; 114:911-919.
15. Phillips RD. Linear and nonlinear models for measuring protein nutritional quality. J Nutr 1981; 111:1058-1066.
16. Finke MD. The Use of Nonlinear Models to Evaluate the Nutritional Quality of Insect Protein. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin. 1984.
17. Canolty NL. Application of saturation kinetics to model effects of energy restriction on protein utilization. Pro Food Nutr Sci 1988; 12:293-296.
18. Phillips RD. Modification of the saturation kinetics model to produce a more versatile protein quality assay. J Nutr 1982; 112:468-473
19. Hung Y-C, McWatters KH, Phillips RD, Chinnan MS. Effects of pre-decortication drying treatment on the microstructure of cowpea products. J. Food Sci. 1990; 55;3:774-776, 807.
20. Haydon KD, West JW. Effect of dietary electrolyte balance on nutrient digestibility determined at the end of the small intestine and over the total digestive tract in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 1990; 68:3687-3693.
21. Furuya S, Kaji Y. The effects of feed intake and purified cellulose on the endogenous ileal amino acid flow in growing pigs. Bri J Nutr 1992; 68:463-472.
22. FAO/WHO. Protein quality evaluation. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Bethesda, MD, 1989.
23. Anon. E4 Users Guide, Version 91.1, Evolutionary Software, Inc. Knoxville, TN 59pp. 1991
24. Anonymous. Method 934.01. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analysis Chemists, Washington D.C. 1990; 69.
25. Anonymous. Method 984.13. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analysis Chemists, Washington D.C. 1990; 74.
26. Barkholt V, Jensen AL. Amino acid analysis: Determination of cysteine plus half-cystine in proteins after hydrochloric acid hydrolysis with a disulfide compound as additive. Anal Biochem 1989; 177:318-322.
27. Tuan, Y.-H. and Phillips, R.D. 1997. Optimized determination of cystine/cysteine and acid-stable amino acids from a single hydrolysate of casein and sorghum-based diet and digesta samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:3535-3540.
28. Anonymous. SAS User's Guide: Basics, Version 5. Cary, NC. SAS Institute Inc., SAS Institute Inc. 1985.
29. Hopkins DT. Effects of variation in protein digestibility, Ch. 11, In: Bodwell CE., Adkins JS, Hopkins DT eds. Protein Quality in Humans: Assessment and In Vitro Estimation. Westport, CT. AVI Publishing Company, Inc., 1981; 169-193.
30. Cousins BW, Tanksley TD, Knabe DA, Zebrowska T. Nutrient digestibility and performance of pigs fed sorghums varying in tannin concentrations. J Animal Sci 1981; 53:1524-1537.
31. Fapojuwo OO, Maga JA, Jansen GR. Effect of extrusion cooking on in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum. J Food Sci 1987; 52:218-219.
32. Phillips RD, Baker EA. Protein nutritional quality of traditional and novel cowpea products measured by in vivo and in vitro methods. J Food Sci 1987; 52:696-699.
33. Tuan, Y-H, Phillips RD. Effect of the hard-to-cook defect and processing on protein and starch digestibility of cowpeas. Cereal Chem 1991; 68:413-418.
34. WU W, Williams WP, Kunkel ME, Acton JC, Huang Y, Wardlaw FB, Grimes, LW. Amino acid availability and availability-corrected amino score of red kedney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Agric Food Chem 1996; 44:1296-1301.
35. Batterham ES, Andersen LM, Baigent DR, Darnell RE, Taverner MR. A comparison of the availability and ileal digestibility of lysine in cottonseed and soya-bean meals for grower/finisher pigs. Br J Nutr 1990; 64:663-677.
36. Henley EC, Kuster JM. Protein quality evaluation by protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scoring. Food Technol 1994; 47;4:74-77.
37. Moughan PJ, Smith, WC. Determination and assessment of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients for the growing pig. New Zealand J. Agric Res 1985; 28:365-370.
38. Sarwar G. Digestibility of protein and bioavailability of amino acids in foods. Wld Rev Nutr Diet 1987: 54:26-70.
39. Green S, Bertrand SL, Duron MJC, Maillard R. Digestibility of amino acids in soya-bean, sunflower and groundnut meal, measured in pigs with ileo-rectal anastomosis and isolation of the large intestine. J. Sci Food Agric 1988; 42:119-128.
40. Anonymous. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Agricultural Research Council, Slough: 1981.
41. Forsum E, Goranzon H, Thilen M. Protein evaluation of mixed diets in young adults, growing pigs, and growing rats. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 36:505-513.