Action and Intermodal Information Influence the Perception of Orientation

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-43

  Fouque, Florent ^a   Bardy, Benoît G ^a,b   Stoffregen, Thomas A ^a   Bootsma, Reinoud J ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033484877     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco1101_1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Asch, S. E., & Witkin, H. A. (1948a). Studies in space orientation. I. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 325-337.
2. Asch, S. E., & Witkin, H. A. (1948b). Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual field and with body tilted. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 455-477.
3. Ballinger, C. J. (1988). The effects of a pitched field orientation on hand/eye coordination. Unpublished master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
4. Bardy, B. G., & Collegia, J.-P. (1993). The role of visual orientation in the control of goal-directed actions. In S. Valenti & J. Pittenger (Eds.), Studies in perception and action II (pp. 176-178). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bardy, B. G., & Laurent, M. (1998). How is body controlled during somersaulting? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 963-977.
6. Bardy, B. G., Marin, L., Stoffregen, T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (in press). Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
7. Bock, O. (1997). Effects of a tilted visual background on human sensory-motor coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 507-512.
8. Bootsma, R. J. (1989). Accuracy of perceptual processes subserving different perception-action systems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 489-500.
9. Carlton, L. G. (1981). Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1019-1030.
10. Coello, Y., & Grealy, M. A. (1997). Effect of size and frame of visual field on the accuracy of an aiming movement. Perception, 26, 287-300.
11. Conti, P., & Beaubaton, D. (1980). Role of structured visual field and visual reafference in accuracy of pointing movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 239-244.
12. Dijkstra, T. M. H., Schöner, G., Giese, M. A., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1994). Frequency dependence of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 71, 489-501.
13. Ebenholtz, S. M. (1970). Perception of the vertical with body tilt in the median plane. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 1-6.
14. Ebenholtz, S. M. (1977). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 531-538.
15. Ebenholtz, S. M., & Benschawel, T. L. (1977). The rod and frame effect and induced head tilt as a function of observation distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 491-496.
16. Fel'dman, A. G. (1966). Functional tuning of the nervous system during control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture - III: Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics, 11, 766-775.
17. Friederici, A. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1987). Resolving perceptual conflicts: The cognitive mechanism of spatial orientation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 58, 164-169.
18. Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1-41.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1952). The relation between visual and postural determinants of the phenomenal vertical. Psychological Review, 59, 370-375.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)
22. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect, and contrast in the perception of a tilted line: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
23. Goodenough, D. R., Cox, P. W., Sigman, E., & Strawderman, W. E. (1985). A cognitive-style conception of the field-dependence dimension. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 687-705.
24. Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P. K., Sigman, E., & Cox, P. W. (1981). The rod-and-frame illusion in erect and supine observers. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 365-370.
25. Harris, C. S. (1974). Beware of the straight-ahead shift - A nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision. Perception, 3, 461-476.
26. Horak, F. B., & Macpherson, J. M. (1996). Postural orientation and equilibrium. In L. B. Rowell & J. T. Shepherd (Eds.), Handbook of physiology (pp. 255-292). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
28. Howard, I. P. (1986). The perception of posture, self-motion, and the visual vertical. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 18.1-18.62). New York: Wiley.
29. Lee, D. N., & Lishman, J. R. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1, 87-95.
30. Mann, C. W., Berthelot-Berry, N. H., & Dauterive, H. J. (1949). The perception of the vertical: I. Visual and non-labyrinthine cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 538-547.
31. Matin, L. (1986). Visual localization and eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 20.1-20.45). New York: Wiley.
32. Matin, L., & Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually influenced eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity. Vision Research, 29, 315-324.
33. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1992). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 257-289.
34. Matin, L., & Li, W. (1995). Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. Journal of Vestibular Research, 5, 499-518.
35. Mittelstaedt, H. (1983). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften, 70, 272-281.
36. Mittelstaedt, H. (1986). The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. Acta Psychologica, 63, 63-85.
37. Nashner, L. M., & McCollum, G. (1985). The organization of postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis. The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 8, 135-172.
38. Neal, E. (1926). Visual localization of the vertical. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 287-291.
39. Nemire, K., & Cohen, M. M. (1993). Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 106-116.
40. Ohlmann, T. (1988). La perception de la verticale. Variabilité inter-individuelle dans la dépendance ô l'égard des référentiels spatiaux [Perception of the vertical. Inter-individual variability in dependency to spatial references]. Unpublished thesis, Université des Sciences Sociales, Grenoble, France.
41. Oman, C. M. (1982). A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of the sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngologica, 44(Suppl. 392), 7.
42. Oman, C. M. (1990). Motion sickness: A synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 68, 294-303.
43. Parker, D. E., & Poston, R. L. (1984). Tilt from head-inverted position produces displacement of visual subjective vertical in the opposite direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 461-465.
44. Poquin, D., Guerraz, M., Ohlmann, T., Marendaz, C., Brenet, F., & Raphel, C. (1995). Visual disturbance and Aubert effect. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 231-253.
45. Riccio, G. E. (1993). Information in movement variability about the qualitative dynamics of posture and orientation. In K. M. Newell & D. M. Corcos (Eds.), Variability and motor control (pp. 317-357). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
46. Riccio, G. E., Martin, E. J., & Stoffregen, T. A. (1992). The role of balance dynamics in the active perception of orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 18, 624-644.
47. Riley, M. A., Mitra, S., Stoffregen, T. A., & Turvey, M. T. (1997). Influences of body lean and vision on unperturbed postural sway. Motor Control, 1, 229-246.
48. Rochat, P. (1992). Self-sitting and reaching in 5-8 month old infants: The impact of posture and its development on early eye-hand coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 210-220.
49. Schöne, H. (1964). On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerospace Medicine, 35, 764-772.
50. Schöne, H. (1984). Spatial orientation: The spatial control of behavior in animals and man. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Schöne, H., & Wade, N. J. (1971).The influence of force magnitude on the perception of body position: II. Effects of the body posture. British Journal of Psychology, 62, 347-352.
52. Stoffregen, T. A., & Bardy, B. G. (1998). On specification and the senses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53. Stoffregen, T. A., Bardy, B. G., Smart, L. J., &Pagulayan, R. J. (in press). On the nature and evaluation of simulator fidelity. In L. Hettinger (Ed.), Virtual and adaptive environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
54. Stoffregen, T. A., & Riccio, G. E. (1988). An ecological theory of orientation and the vestibular system. Psychological Review, 95, 3-14.
55. Stoffregen, T. A., & Riccio, G. E. (1991). An ecological critique of the sensory conflict theory of motion sickness. Ecological Psychology, 3, 159-194.
56. Stoffregen, T. A., Smart, L. J., Bardy, B. G., & Pagulayan, R. J. (in press). Postural stabilization of looking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
57. Stoper, A. E., & Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 469-475.
58. Stoper, A. E., Fries, C., & Bautista, A. (1992, November). The effect of environmental pitch on apparent slant. Paper presented to Psychonomic Society of America, St Louis, MO.
59. Streibel, M. J., Barnes, R. D., Julness, J. D., & Ebenholtz, S. M. (1980). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: Role of organization and subjective contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 128-138.
60. Templeton, W. B. (1973). The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 451-457.
61. Welch, R. B., & Post, R. B. (1996). Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 383-389.
62. Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948a). Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 603-614.
63. Witkin, H. A., & Asch, S. E. (1948b). Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 762-782.
64. Young, L. R. (1984). Perception of the body in space: Mechanisms. In I. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of physiology - The nervous system (Vol. 3, pp. 1023-1066). New York: Academic.