Priming word order in sentence production

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 129-147

  Hartsuiker, Robert J ^a,b   Kolk, Herman H J ^a   Huiskamp, Philippine ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033482248     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755798     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Behagel, O. (1932). Deutsche Syntax: Band IV. Wortstellung. Periodenbau [German syntax: Part IV. Word order. Sentence structure]. Heidelberg: Winters.
2. Bloom, L., & LaHey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Bock, J.K. (1977). The effect of pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 723-734.
4. Bock, J.K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1-47.
5. Bock, J.K. (1986a). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575-586.
6. Bock, J.K. (1986b). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355-387.
7. Bock, J.K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163-186.
8. Bock, J.K., & Cutting, J.C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99-127.
9. Bock, J.K., & Eberhard, K.M. (1993). Meaning sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57-99.
10. Bock, J.K., & Levelt, W.J. (1994). Language production. Grammatical encoding. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego: Academic Press.
11. Bock, J.K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1-39.
12. Bock, J.K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150-171.
13. Bock, J.K., & Miller, C.A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45-93.
14. Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P., Stewart, A.J., & Urbach, T.P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489-506.
15. Collins, P. (1995). The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33, 35-49.
16. De Smedt, K.J. (1990). IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp. 167-192). London: Academic Press.
17. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
18. Dell, G.S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
19. Dell, G.S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
20. Eberhard, K.M. (1997). The marked effect of number on subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 147-164.
21. Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 437-464.
22. Flores D'Arcais, G.B. (1975). Some perceptual determinants of sentence construction. In G.B. Flores D'Arcais (Ed.), Studies in perception: Festschrift for Fabio Metelli (pp. 344-373). Milano: Aldo Martello-Giunti Editore.
23. Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52. (Reprinted in Speech errors as linguistic evidence, pp. 215-242, by V.A. Fromkin (Ed.), 1973, The Hague: Mouton)
24. Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52. (Reprinted in Speech errors as linguistic evidence, pp. 215-242, by V.A. Fromkin (Ed.), 1973, The Hague: Mouton)
25. Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 133-177). New York: Academic Press.
26. Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Volume 1: Speech and talk (pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.
27. Haanstra, J.-A. (1995, December). Heaviness influences in the processing of sentences with a coordination. Poster presented at the First Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, Edinburgh, 1995.
28. Hartsuiker, R.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. (1998a). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 221-254.
29. Hartsuiker, R.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. (1998b). Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech, 143-184.
30. Haviland, S.B.E., & Clark, H.H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
31. Hawkins, J.A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kaplan, R., & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kempen, G. (1977). Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production. In S. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Sentence production: Developments in research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.
35. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185-209.
36. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Levelt, W.J.M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 14, 78-106.
38. Levelt, W.J.M., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In W. Klein & W.J.M. Levelt (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Studies presented to Manfred Bierwisch (pp. 221-252). Dordrecht: Reidel.
39. Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Pacific Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole.
40. McDonald, J.L., Bock, J.K., & Kelly, M.H. (1993). Word and world order: semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188-230.
41. Pechmann, T., Uszkoreit, H., Engelkamp, J., & Zerbst, D. (1996). Wortstellung im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Theorie und psycholinguistische Evidenz [Word order in the German middle field. Linguistic theory and psycholinguistic evidence]. In C. Habel, S. Kanngiesser, & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Perspektiven der kognitiven Linguistik. Modelle und Methoden [Perspectives of cognitive linguistics. Models and methods). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
42. Pick, A. (1913). Die agrammatischen Sprachstörungen. Berlin: Springer.
43. Prat-Sala, M., Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Shillcock, R.C. (1996). Is word order influenced by conceptual accessiblity? Poster presented at the 9th CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, New York.
44. Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Röder, B., & Hennighausen, E. (1998). Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variation of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 150-176.
45. Stallings, L.M., MacDonald, M.C., & O'Seaghda, P.G. (1995, March). Phrase order constraints in heavy-NP shift. Poster presented at the eighth annual CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, Tucson.
46. Stemberger, J.P. (1982). Syntactic errors in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 313-345.
47. Tannenbaum, P.H., & Williams, F. (1968). Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 246-250.
48. Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (in press). Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production. Is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition.
49. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Garrett, M.F. (1996). Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61, 261-298.
50. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
51. Vigliocco, G., Hartsuiker, R.J., Jarema, G., & Kolk, H.H.J. (1996). One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 407-442.
52. Von Kleist, H. (1805). Über die allmählige Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden (On the progressive elaboration of thought while speaking]. In H. Sembdner (Ed.), Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
53. Weiner, E.J., & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29-58.