Development and evaluation of a background attitude indicator

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-71

  Liggett, Kristen K ^a   Reising, John M ^a,c   Hartsock, David C ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Veridian   (United States)

^c WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033482236     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Burns, R. K., & Levering, P. B. (1988). F-15E EADI evaluation: A comparison of three formats (Rep. No. ASD-TR-88-5030). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aeronautical Systems Division.
2. Galatowitsch, S. (1993, May). Liquid crystals vs. cathode ray tubes. Defense Electronics, p. 26.
3. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4. Glines, C. V. (1989, September). Flying blind. Air Force Magazine, pp. 138-141.
5. Hughes, H., Layton, M., Baird, J., & Lester, L. (1984). Global precedents in visual pattern recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 361-371.
6. Klass, P. J. (1956, July). Instrument design, part I: USAF reveals new instrument concept. Aviation Week & Space Technology, pp 62-69.
7. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
8. Regan, D. M., Kaufman, L., & Lincoln, J. (1986). Motion in depth and visual acceleration. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1929-1931). New York: Wiley.
9. Reising, J. M., Barthelemy, K. K., & Hartsock, D. C. (1991). Unusual attitude recoveries using a pathway in the sky. In Proceedings of American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Flight Simulation Technologies Conference. New Orleans, LA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
10. Reising, J. M., Zenyuh, J. P., & Barthelemy, K. K. (1988). Head-up display symbology for unusual attitude recovery. In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 926-930). Dayton, OH: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
11. Spengler, R. P. (1988). Advanced fighter cockpit (Rep. No. ERR-FW-2936). Fort Worth, TX: General Dynamics.
12. Taylor, R. (1984). Some effects of display format variables on the perception of aircraft spatial orientation. In Proceedings of AGARD Conference No. 371, Williamsburg, VA: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
13. U.S. Air Force. (1998). Air Force manual 11-217. Retrieved November 4, 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://afpubs.hq.af.mil/elec-products/pubpages/11-pubs.stm
14. Weinstein, L. F., Ercoline, W. R., & Bitton, D. F. (1992). The utility of a ghost horizon and climb/dive ladder tapering on a head-up display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 48-51). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
15. Wong, E., & Weisstein, X. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 194-202.