Do husbands and wives make the same choices? Evidence from Northern Ethiopia

Economics Letters

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 253-260

  Lampietti, Julian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Common preferences; Contingent valuation; Intrahousehold; Q12; R20

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033479494     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00223-7     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Alderman H., Chiappori P.A., Haddad L., Hoddinott J., Kanbur R. Unitary versus collective models of the household: Is it time to shift the burden of proof? The World Bank Research Observer. 10(1):1995;1-19.
2. Behrman, J., 1997. Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In: Rosenzweig, M., Stark, O. (Eds.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Elsevier Science.
3. Ghebreyesus T., Alemayehu T., Bosman A., Witten K., Teklehaimanot A. Community participation in malaria control in Tigray region Ethiopia. Acta Tropica. 61:1996;145-156.
4. Grossman M. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J. Political Economy. 80(2):1972;223-255.
5. Haddad, L., Hoddinot, J., Alderman, H., 1997. In: Haddad, L., Hoddinot, J., Alderman, H. (Eds.), Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policy, Johns Hopkins, Washington, DC.
6. Strauss, J., Thomas, D., 1995. Human resources: Empirical modeling of household family decisions. In: Behrman, J., Srinisvasan, T.N. (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 3, North Holland Press, Amsterdam.
7. Strauss, J., Beegle, K., 1996. Intrahousehold allocations: A review of theories, empirical evidence and policy issues, Michigan State University International Development Working Paper No. 62, Michigan State University.