The influence of language/cognitive profile on discourse intervention outcome

Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 61-67

  Cole, Kevin N ^a   Coggins, Truman E ^b   Vanderstoep, Cheryl ^b  

^a Washington Research Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive hypothesis; Cognitive referencing; Discourse; Eligibility; Language intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033476115     PISSN: 01611461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461.3001.61     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blank, M., Rose, S., & Berlin, L. (1978). Preschool Language Assessment Instrument: The language of learning in practice. Orlando, FL: Grime & Stratton.
2. Casby, M. (1992). The cognitive hypothesis and its influence on speech-language services in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 198-202.
3. Cole, K., Dale, P., & Mills, P. (1990). Defining language delay in young children by cognitive referencing: Are we saying more than we know? Applied Psycholinguistics. 11, 291-302.
4. Cole, K. N., Dale, P. S., & Mills, P. E. (1991). Individual differences in language delayed children's responses to direct and interactive preschool instruction. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 99-124.
5. Cole, K. N., Dale, P. S., Mills. P. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1993). Interaction between early intervention curricula and student characteristics. Exceptional Children, 60, 17-28.
6. Cole, K. N., & Fey, M. E. (1996). Cognitive referencing in language assessment. In K. Cole, P. Dale, & D. Thai (Eds.), Assessment of communication and language (pp. 143-160). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
7. Cole, K. N., & Harris, S. R. (1992). Instability of the intelligence quotient-motor quotient relationship. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34, 633-641.
8. Cromer, R. F. (1976). The cognitive hypothesis of language acquisition and its implications for child language deficiency. In D. Morehead & A. Morehead (Eds.), Normal and deficient child language (pp. 283-333). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
9. Cromer, R. (1988). The cognitive hypothesis revisited. In F. Kessell (Ed.), The development of language and language researchers (pp. 223-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
11. Fey, M. E., Long, S. H., & Cleave, P. L. (1994). Reconsideration of IQ criteria in the definition of specific language impairment. In R. V. Watkins & M. L. Rice (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (pp. 161-178). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
12. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555-561.
13. Gallagher, T. (1991). Pragmatics of language. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
14. Hresko, W., Reid, D., & Hammill, D. (1981). Test of Early Language Development. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
15. Lahey, P. (1990). Who shall be called language impaired? Some reflections and one perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 612-620.