Analysis of work group productivity in an applied setting: Application of a time series panel design

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 927-967

  Latham, William R ^c   Pritchard, Robert D ^c   Bennett Jr , Winston R ^a   Sawyer, John E ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033474152     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Argyris C, Schön DA. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bergh DD. (1993a). Watch the time carefully: The use and misuse of time effects in management research. Journal of Management, 19, 685-705.
3. Bergh DD. (1993b). Don't "waste" your time! The effects of time series errors in management research: The case of ownership concentration and research development spending. Journal of Management, 19, 897-914.
4. Cohen J, Cohen P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cook TD, Campbell DT. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Earley PC, Connoly T, Ekegren G. (1989). Goals, strategy development, and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24-33.
7. Earley PC, Lee C, Hanson LA. (1990). Joint moderating effects of job experience and task component complexity: Relations among goal setting, task strategies, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 3-15.
8. Judd CM, Kenny DA. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Klimoski R, Mohammed S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
10. Locke EA, Latham GP. (1990). Work motivation: The high performance cycle. In Kleinbeck U, Quast H, Thierry H, Hartmut H (Eds.), Work motivation (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Mitchell TR, Silver WS. (1990). Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 185-193.
12. Naylor JC, Pritchard RD, Ilgen DR. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.
13. Pritchard RD. (1990). Measuring and improving organizational productivity: A practical guide. New York: Praeger.
14. Pritchard RD. (1995). Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies. New York: Praeger.
15. Pritchard RD, Jones SD, Roth PL, Stuebing KK, Ekeberg SE. (1988). Effects of feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity [Monograph]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 337-358.
16. Pritchard RD, Jones SD, Roth PL, Stuebing KK, Ekeberg SE. (1989). The evaluation of an integrated approach to measuring organizational productivity. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 42, 69-115.
17. Riedel JA, Nebeker DM, Cooper BL. (1988). The influence of monetary incentives on goal choice, goal commitment, and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 155-180.
18. SAS Institute Inc. 1993. SAS/ETS Users Guide (Version 6, 2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
19. Tschan F, von Cranach M. (1996). Group task structure, process and outcome. In West MA (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 95-121). New York: Wiley.
20. Weingart LR. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682-693.
21. Weingart LR, Weldon E. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and group member performance. Human Performance, 4, 33-54.
22. Weldon E, Jehn KA, Pradhan P. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 555-569.
23. Wood RE, Locke EA. (1990). Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. In Staw B, Cummings L (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 93-109). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Wood RE, Mento AJ, Locke EA. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416-425.
25. Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
26. Wright PM. (1992). An examination of the relationships among monetary incentives, goal level, goal commitment, and performance. Journal of Management, 18, 677-693.