Cognitive science and neuroscience: New wave reductionism

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 297-307

  Richardson, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033474014     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095150899105774     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BALZER, W., MOULINES, C.U. & SNEED, J. (1987). An architectonic for science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
2. BECHTEL, W. & ABRAHAMSEN, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
3. BECHTEL, W. & RICHARDSON, R.C. (1993). Discovering complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. BICKLE, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: the new wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BURIAN, R., RICHARDSON, R.C. & VAN DER STEEN, W.J. (1996). Against generality: meaning in genetics and philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 27, 1-29.
6. CHURCHLAND, P.M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. CHURCHLAND, P.M. & CHURCHLAND, P.S. (1990). Intertheoretic reduction: a neuroscientist's field guide. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 249-256.
8. CHURCHLAND, P.M. & CHURCHLAND, P.S. (1996). Replies. In R.N. MCCAULEY (Ed.) The Churchlands and their critics. London: Basil Blackwell.
9. CHURCHLAND, P.S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: toward a unified theory of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
10. FODOR, J.A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
11. FODOR, J.A. & PYLYSHYN, Z.W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture. In S. PINKER & J. MEHLER (Eds) Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. HOOKER, C.A. (1981). Towards a general theory of reduction (in three parts). Dialogue, 20, 38-59, 201-236, 496-529.
13. KANDEL, E. & SCHWARTZ, J.H. (1982). Molecular biology of learning. Science, 218, 433-442.
14. MCCAULEY, R.N. (1986). Intertheoretic relations and the future of psychology. Philosophy of Science, 53, 179-199.
15. MCCAULEY, R.N. (1996). Explanatory pluralism and the co-evolution of theories in science. In R.N. MCCAULEY (Ed.) The Churchlands and their critics. London: Basil Blackwell.
16. NAGEL, E. (1961). The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
17. PINKER, S. & PRINCE, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition architecture. In S. PINKER & J. MEHLER (Eds) Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. RESCORLA, R. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: it's not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151-160.
19. RICHARDSON, R.C. (1979). Functionalism and reductionism. Philosophy of Science, 46, 533-558.
20. RICHARDSON, R.C. (1982). How not to reduce a functional psychology. Philosophy of Science, 49, 125-137.
21. RICHARDSON, R.C. (in press). Explication et causalité dans les systèmes auto-organisés. In B. FELTZ, M. CROMMELINCK & P. GOUJON (Eds) Auto-organisation et émergences dan les sciences de la vie. Brussels: OUSIA.
22. SCHAFFNER, K. (1967). Approaches to reduction. Philosophy of Science, 34, 137-147.
23. WIMSATT, W.C. (1974). Reductive explanation: a functional account. In R.S. COHEN et al. (Eds) PSA 1974. Dordrecht: Reidel.
24. WIMSATT, W.C. (1976). Reductionism, levels of organization, and the mind-body problem. In G. GLOBUS, G. MAXWELL & I. SAVODNIK (Eds) Consciousness and the brain. New York: Plenum Press.
25. WOODWARD, J. (1989). The causal mechanical model of explanation. In P. KITCHER & W.C. SALMON (Eds) Scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.