Characteristics on stochastic DEA efficiency-reliability and probability being efficient-

Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 389-404

  Morita, Hiroshi ^b   Seiford, Lawrence M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033473573     PISSN: 04534514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0453-4514(00)87109-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. P. Andersen and N. C. Petersen: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39 (1993) 1261-1264.
2. S. E. Atkinson and P. W. Wilson: Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: A bootstrap methodology. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6 (1995) 137-152.
3. R. D. Banker: Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation. Management Science, 39 (1993) 1265-1273.
4. O. B. Olesen and N. C. Petersen: Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41 (1995) 442-457.
5. L. M. Seiford: Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7 (1996) 99-138.
6. L. M. Seiford and J. Zhu, Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 108 (1998) 127-139.
7. J. K. Sengupta: Transformations in stochastic DEA models. Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1990) 109-124.
8. L. Simar: Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3 (1992) 171-203.
9. K. Tone: A simple characterization of return to scale in DEA. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39 (1996) 604-613.