The effects of different rates of the herbicide glyphosate on spiders in arable field margins

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 249-254

  Haughton, Alison J ^a   Bell, James R ^b   Boatman, Nigel D ^c   Wilcox, Andy ^a  

^a HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Allerton Res and Educational Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033473196     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alderweireldt, M. 1994a. Habitat manipulations increasing spider densities in agroecosystems: possibilities for biological control? J. Appl. Entomol., 118:10-16.
2. Alderweireldt, M. 1994b. Prey selection and prey capture strategies of linyphiid spiders in high input agricultural fields. Bull. British Arachnol. Soc., 9:300-308.
3. Asteraki, E.J., C.B. Hanks & R.O. Clements. 1992. The impact of the chemical removal of the hedge-base flora on the community structure of carabid beetles (Col., Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) of the field and hedge bottom. J. Appl. Entomol., 113:398-406.
4. Bayram, A. & M.L. Luff. 1993. Winter abundance and diversity of Lycosids (Lycosidae, Araneae) and other spiders in grass tussocks in a field margin. Pedobiologia, 37:357-364.
5. Boatman, N.D. 1989. Selective weed control in field margins. Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds, 1989:785-794.
6. Boatman, N.D. (ed.). 1994. Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation. BCPC Farnham, UK.
7. Cocquempot, C. & J-P. Chambon. 1990. L'activite des Araignees et son incidence sur la limitation des populations de pucerons des biocenoses cerealieres. Rev. Ecol. Sol., 27:205-219.
8. De Snoo, G.R. 1997. Arable flora in sprayed and unsprayed crop edges. Agric. Ecosystems and Environ., 66:223-230.
9. Duelli, P., M. Studer, I. Marchand & S. Jacob. 1990. Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biol. Conserv., 54:193-207.
10. Everts, J.W., B. Aukema, R. Hengeveld & J.H. Koeman. 1989. Side-effects of pesticides on ground-dwelling predatory arthropods in arable ecosystems. Environ. Poll., 59:203-225.
11. Greenstone, M.H. 1984. Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia, 62:299-304.
12. McFerran, D.M., W.I. Montgomery & J.H. Mc-Adam. 1994. The impact of grazing on communities of ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in upland vegetation types. Proc. Royal Irish Acad., 94B:119-126.
13. Mansour, F. & U. Heimbach. 1993. Evaluation of lycosid, micryphantid and linyphiid spiders as predators of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hom: Aphididae) and their functional response to prey density - Laboratory experiments. Entomophaga, 38: 79-87.
14. Marrs, R.H., A.J. Frost, R.A. Plant & P. Lunnis. 1992. The effects of herbicide drift on semi-natural vegetation: the use of buffer zones to minimize risks. Aspects of Appl. Biol., 29:57-64.
15. Mueller, T.C. & A.R. Womac. 1997. Effect of formulation and nozzle type on droplet size with isopropylamine and trimesium salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol., 11:639-643.
16. Nentwig, W. 1986. Non-webbuilding spiders: prey specialists or generalists? Oecologia, 69:571-576.
17. Raatikainen, M. & V. Huhta. 1968. On the spider fauna of Finnish oat fields. Ann. Zool. Fennica, 5:254-261.
18. Rovner, J.S. 1980. Vibration in Heteropoda venatoria (Sparassidae): a third method of sound production in spiders. J. Arachnol., 8:193-200.
19. Samu, F. & F. Vollrath. 1992. Spider orb web as bioassay for pesticide side effects. Entomol. Exp. App., 62:117-124.
20. Samu, F., K.D. Sunderland, C.J. Topping & J.S. Fenlon. 1996. A spider population in flux: selection and abandonment of artificial web-sites and the importance of intraspecific interactions in Lepthyphantes tenuis (Araneae: Linyphiidae) in wheat. Oecologia, 106:228-239.
21. Samu, F., J. Nemeth & B. Kiss. 1997. Assessment of the efficiency of a hand-held suction device for sampling spiders: improved density estimation or oversampling? Ann. Appl. Biol., 130: 371-378.
22. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York.
23. Thomas, M.B., S.D. Wratten & N.W. Sotherton. 1991. Creation of 'island' habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods: predator densities and emigration. J. Appl. Ecol., 28:906-917.
24. Topping, C.J. & G.L. Lovei. 1997. Spider density and diversity in relation to disturbance in agroecosystems in New Zealand with a comparison to England. New Zealand J. Ecol., 21:121-128.
25. Uetz, G.W. 1991. Habitat structure and spider foraging. Pp. 325-348. In Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. (S.S. Bell, E.D. McCoy & H.R. Muschinsky, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London.
26. Uetz, G.W., & G.E. Stratton. 1982. Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in spiders. Pp. 123-159. In Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. (P.N. Witt & J.S. Rovner, eds.). Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
27. Von Ende, C.N. 1993. Repeated measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. Pp. 113-137. In Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. (S.M. Scheiner & J. Gurevitch, eds.). Chapman & Hall, London.
28. White, P.C.L. & M. Hassall. 1994. Effects of management on spider communities of headlands in cereal fields. Pedobiologia, 38:169-184.
29. Young, O.P. & G.B. Edwards. 1990. Spiders in United States field crops and their potential effect on crop pests. J. Arachnol., 18:1-27.