Leader, follower, team player, thief: An exploration of managers' performer categories

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 199-215

  Sanders, Martha M ^a  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033469530     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022979022308     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Borman, W.C. (1987). Personal constructs, performance schema, and "Folk Theories" of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an Army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 307-322.
2. Breen, T.J. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1986). Classification of empirically derived prototypes as a function of category experience. Memory & Cognition, 14, 313-320.
3. Cardy, R.L., Bernardin, H.J., Abbott, J.G., Senderak, M.P. &Taylor, K. (1987). The effects of individual performance schemata and dimension familiarization on rating accuracy. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 197-205.
4. Cotton, J.L. (1986). The impact of prototype categorization on evaluation ratings. Paper presented at the Society of Industrial/Organizational Psychologists, First Annual Conference, Chicago.
5. Dawson, V.L. & Zeitz, C.M. (1989). Expert-novice differences in person perception: Evidence of experts' sensitivities to the organization of behavior. Social Cognition, 7, 1-30.
6. Day, D. & Sulsky, L. (1995). Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 158-167.
7. Duck, S.W. (1982). Two individuals in search of agreement: The commonality corollary. In J.C. Mancuso & J.R. Adams-Webber (Eds.), The constructing person. New York: Praeger.
8. Favero, J. & Ilgen, D. (1989). The effects of ratee prototypicality on rater observation and accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 932-946.
9. Feldman, J.M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127-148.
10. Fiske, S.T. & Linville, P.W. (1980). What does the schema concept buy us? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543-557.
11. Flink, C. & Park, B. (1991). Increasing consensus in trait judgments through outcome dependency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 453-467.
12. Holcom, M., Lehman, W. & Lord, C. (1993). Social categorization and the influence of drug involvement on drug attitude structures: Implications for assessing drug use and tolerance in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1968-1988.
13. Kinicki, A.J., Horn, P.W., Trost, M.R. & Wade, K.J. (1995). Effects of category prototypes on performance rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 354-370.
14. Kulik, C. & Ambrose, M. (1993). Category-based and feature-based processes in performance appraisal: Integrating visual and computerized sources of performance data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 821-830.
15. Kulik, C. & Clark, S. (1994). Category based and feature based cognitive processes: The role of unfavorable information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1891-1918.
16. Lance, C., LaPointe, J. & Stewart, A. (1994). A test of the context dependency of three causal models of rater halo error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 332-340.
17. Lord, R.G. & Carpenter, M. (1986). Measuring cognitive processes. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Chicago.
18. Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J. & DeVader, C.L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 34, 343-378.
19. Lurigio, A.J. & Carroll, J.S. (1985). Probation officers' schemata of offenders: Content, development, and impact on treatment decisions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 112-1126.
20. Macan, T. & Dipboye, R. (1994). The effects of the application on processing of information from the employment interview. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1291-1314.
21. McCloskey, M.E. & Glucksberg, S. (1979). Natural categories: Well-defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.
22. Mount, M.K. & Thompson, D.E. (1987). Cognitive categorization and quality of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 240-246.
23. Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1990). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Nathan, B.R. & Lord, R.G. (1983). Cognitive categorization and dimensional schemata: A process approach to the study of halo in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 102-114.
25. Park, B. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 907-917.
26. Perry, E. (1994). A prototype matching approach to understanding the role of applicant gender and age in the evaluation of job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1433-73.
27. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Rush, M. & Russell, J. (1988). Leader prototypes and prototype contingent consensus in leader behavior descriptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 88-104.
29. Vianen, A. & Willemsen, T. (1992). The employment interview: The role of sex stereotypes in the evaluation of male and female job applicants in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 471-491.