Women's perspectives on feminism: A Q-methodological study

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 247-266

  Snelling, Susan J ^a  

^a Box 56   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033468675     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00357.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Black, N. (1989). Social feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Breinlinger, S., & Kelly, C. (1994). Women's responses to status inequality: A test of Social Identity Theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 1-16.
3. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Code, L. (1988). Feminist theory. In S. Burt, L. Code, & L. Dorney (Eds.), Changing patterns: Women in Canada (pp. 18-49). Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
5. Descarries-Belanger, F., & Roy, S. (1991). The women's movement and its currents of thought: A typological essay (J. Beeman, Trans.) Ottawa: CRIAW/ICREF. (Original work published 1988).
6. Frye, M. (1992) Willful virgin: Essays in feminism. Freedom, CA: Crossing.
7. Jaggar, A. M., & Rothenberg, P. S. (1993) (Eds.). Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between women and men (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Kitzinger, C. (1986). Introducing and developing Q as a feminist methodology. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychology (pp. 151-172). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
9. Kitzinger, C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.
10. Kitzinger, C., & Rogers, R. S. (1985). A Q-methodological study of lesbian identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 167-187.
11. Linton, R. (1989). Conceptualizing feminism: Clarifying social science concepts. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 25-29.
12. McFadden, M. (1984). Anatomy of a difference: Toward a classification of feminist theory. Women's Studies International Forum, 7, 495-504.
13. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. (Sage University Papers: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 07-066). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Morawski, J. (1992). Review of Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 261-264.
15. Oakley, A. (1981). Subject women. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
16. Senn, C. Y. (1991). The impact of pornography in women's lives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, North York, ON.
17. Senn, C. Y. (1993). Women's multiple perspectives and experiences with pornography. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 319-341.
18. Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66 (Ms. No. 153).
19. SPSS Inc. (1988). SPSS-X user's guide (3rd ed.). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
20. Stacey, J. (1990) Sexism by a subtler name? Postindustrial conditions and postfeminist consciousness in Silicon Valley. In K. V. Hansen & I. J. Philipson (Eds.), Women, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialist feminist reader (pp. 338-356). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21. Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
23. Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview.