Polysemy Effects in Word Naming

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 189-193

  Lichacz, Frederick M ^a   Herdman, Chris M ^a   Lefevre, J O Anne ^a   Baird, Brenda ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033468377     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087309     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Besner, D., & Joordens, S. (1995). Wrestling with ambiguity - Further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky (1995) and Rueckl (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 515-519.
2. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 63-85.
3. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press.
4. Ferraro, F. R., & Kellas, G. (1990). Normative data for number of word meanings. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 491-498.
5. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexicality and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
6. Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1331-1356.
7. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2554-2558.
8. Kawamoto, A. H., Farrar, W. T., & Kello, C. (1994). When two meanings are better than one: modelling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1233-1247.
9. Kellas, G., Ferraro, R. F., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the time-course of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 601-609.
10. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
11. Masson, M. E. J. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Masson, M. E. J. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 3-23.
13. Masson, M. E. J., & Borowsky, R. (1995). Unsettling questions about semantic ambiguity in connectionist models: Comment on Joordens and Besner (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 509-514.
14. Millis, M. L., & Button, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don't. Memory & Cognition, 17, 141-147.
15. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.