A dynamic model of political change among party activists

Political Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 17-41

  Carsey, Thomas M ^a   Layman, Geoffrey C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033466623     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023344412661     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, Greg D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science 41: 718-737.
2. Aldrich, John H. (1983a). A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review 77: 974-990.
3. Aldrich, John H. (1983b). A spatial model with party activists: Implications for electoral dynamics. Public Choice 41: 63-100.
4. Aldrich, John H. (1995). Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Aldrich, John H., and Michael D. McGinnis (1989). A model of party constraints on optimal candidate positions. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 12: 437-50.
6. Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science 39: 1055-1082.
7. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul R. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Carmines, Edwards G., and James A. Stimson (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Chappell, Henry W., Jr., and William R. Keech (1986). Policy motivation and party differences in a dynamic spatial model of party competition. American Political Science Review 80: 881-900.
10. Converse, Philip E., and Gregory B. Markus (1979). Plus ca charge . . . The new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review 73:32-49.
11. Green, John C., James L. Guth, Corwin E. Smidt, and Lyman A. Kellstedt (1996). Religion and the Culture Wars. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
12. Guth, James L., Corwin E. Smidt, Lyman A. Kellstedt, and John C. Green (1993). The sources of antiabortion attitudes. American Politics Quarterly 21: 65-80.
13. Herrera, Richard (1992). The understanding of ideological labels by political elites: A research note. Western Political Quarterly 45: 1021-1035.
14. Herrera, Richard (1995). The crosswinds of change: Sources of change in the Democratic and Republican parties. Political Research Quarterly 48: 291-312.
15. Huckfeldt, Robert, and Carol W. Kohfeld (1989). Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
16. Huckfeldt, Robert R., C. W. Kohfeld, and Thomas W. Likens (1982). Dynamic Modeling: An Introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Hunter, James Davison (1994). Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America's Culture War. New York: Macmillan.
18. Key, V. O. (1955). A theory of critical elections. Journal of Politics 17: 3-18.
19. Key, V. O. (1959). Secular realignment and the party system. Journal of Politics 21: 198-210.
20. Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr., with Charles D. Hadley (1975). Transformations of the American Party System. New York: Norton.
21. Layman, Geoffrey C. (1998). Culture wars in the American party system: Religious and cultural change among partisan activists since 1972. American Politics Quarterly, forthcoming.
22. Layman, Geoffrey C., and Thomas M. Carsey (1998). Why do party activists convert? An analysis of individual-level change on the abortion issue. Political Research Quarterly 51: 723-749.
23. Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein Rokkan, eds. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.
24. MacDonald, Stuart Elaine, and George Rabinowitz (1987). The dynamics of structural realignment. American Political Science Review 81: 775-796.
25. Miller, Warren E., and M. Kent Jennings (1986). Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Sage.
26. Przeworski, Adam, and John Sprague (1986). Paper Stones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Rapoport, Ronald B., and Walter J. Stone (1994). A model for disaggregating political change. Political Behavior 16: 505-532.
28. Riker, William H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
29. Stone, Walter J. (1991). What do we know? American Journal of Political Science 35: 598-607.
30. Stone, Walter J., Ronald B. Rapoport, and Alan I. Abramowitz (1990). The Reagan revolution and party polarization in the 1980s. In L. Sandy Maisel (ed.), The Parties Respond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31. Sundquist, James L. (1983). Dynamics of the Party System, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.