Testing endogenous growth in South Korea and Taiwan

Journal of Development Economics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 317-341

  Feenstra, Robert C ^a   Madani, Dorsati ^d   Yang, Tzu Han ^b   Liang, Chi Yuan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Executive Yuan   (Taiwan)

^c INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS   (Taiwan)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Endogenous growth; Product variety; South Korea; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENDOGENOUS GROWTH; EXPORT; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY;

SOUTH KOREA; TAIWAN;

EID: 0033457396     PISSN: 03043878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00054-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aw, B.Y., Chen, X., Roberts, M.J., 1997. Firm-Level Evidence on Productivity Differentials, Turnover, and Exports in Taiwanese Manufacturing. Pennsylvania State University and World Bank, mimeo.
2. Burnside, C., Eichenbaum, M., Rebelo, S., 1995. Capacity utilization and returns to scale. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1995. NBER and Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 67-110.
3. Clerides S.K., Lach S., Tybout J.R. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108(3):1998;903-948.
4. Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R.G., Petersen, B.C., 1988. Market structure and cyclical fluctuations in U.S. manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 55-66.
5. Easterly, W., 1995. Explaining miracles: growth regressions meet the Gang of Four. In: Ito, T., Krueger, A.O. (Eds.), Growth Theories in Light of East Asian Experience. NBER and Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 267-298.
6. Feenstra R.C. New product varieties and the measurement of international prices. American Economic Review. 84(1):1994;157-177.
7. Feenstra, R.C., 1996. NBER Trade Database, Disk 1. U.S. Imports, 1972-1994. Working Paper no. 5515.
8. Feenstra R.C., Markusen J. Accounting for growth with new inputs. International Economic Review. 35(2):1994;429-447.
9. Feenstra, R.C., Huang, D.-S., Hamilton, G.G., 1997. Business Groups and Trade in East Asia: Part 1. Networked Equilibria. NBER Working Paper no. 5886.
10. Feenstra R.C., Yang M., Hamilton G.G. Business groups and product variety in trade: evidence from South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Journal of International Economics. 48(1):1999;71-100.
11. Frankel, J.A., Romer, D., 1996. Trade and Growth: an Empirical Investigation. NBER Working Paper no. 5476, March.
12. Frankel, J.A., Romer, D., Cyrus, T., 1996. Trade and Growth in East Asian Countries: Cause and Effect? NBER Working Paper no. 5732, August.
13. Fukuda, S., Toya, H., 1995. Conditional convergence in East Asian countries: the role of exports in economic growth. In: Ito, T., Krueger, A.O. (Eds.), Growth Theories in Light of East Asian Experience. NBER and Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 247-262.
14. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Hall R.E. The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. Journal of Political Economy. 96(5):1988;921-947.
16. Hall, R.E., 1990. Invariance properties of Solow's productivity residual. In: Diamond, P. (Ed.), Growth/Productivity/Unemployment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 71-112.
17. Harrison A. Productivity, imperfect competition, and trade reform: theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics. 36(1/2):1994;53-74.
18. Itoh, T., Krueger, A.O. (Eds.), Growth Theories in Light of the East Asian Experience. NBER and Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, 1995.
19. Jones C. Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(2):1995;495-526.
20. Jones C. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy. 103(4):1995;759-784.
21. Jorgenson, D.W., Liang, C.-Y., 1995. The Industry-Level Output Growth and Total Factor Productivity Changes in Taiwan, 1961-1993. Department of Economics, Harvard University and Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, May, mimeo.
22. Kocherlakota N.R., Yi K.-M. A simple time series test of endogenous vs. exogenous growth models: an application to the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics. 78(1):1996;126-134.
23. Kocherlakota N.R., Yi K.-M. Is there endogenous long-run growth? Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 29(2):1997;235-262.
24. Krugman, P., 1994. The Myth of Asia's Miracle. Foreign Affairs, November/December, pp. 62-78.
25. Liang, C.-Y., 1989. The Sources of Growth and Productivity Change in Taiwan's Industries, 1961-1981. Discussion Paper, The Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
26. Madani, D., 1996. Productivity, Markups and Government Policy: Estimates for South Korea, 1972-1991. University of California, Davis, November, mimeo.
27. Madani, D., 1997. Imperfect Competition, Economies of Scale and the Impact of Government Policies on Productivity: South Korea and Taiwan, 1972-1991. PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis.
28. Mankiw G.N., Romer D., Weil D.N. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107(2):1992;407-437.
29. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 98(5):1990;S71-S102. Part 2.
30. Sato K. The ideal log-change index number. Review of Economics and Statistics. 58(2):1976;223-228.
31. The World Bank, 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Washington, DC.
32. Vartia Y.O. Ideal log-change index numbers. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 3(3):1976;121-126.
33. Young, A., 1992. A tale of two cities: factor accumulation and technical change in Hong Kong and Singapore. In: Blanchard, O., Fischer, S. (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1992. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 13-53.
34. Ziele, W., 1993. Industrial Targeting, Business Organization and Industry Productivity Growth in the Republic of Korea, 1972-1985. PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis.