Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides: Is it necessary?

Cancer

Volumn 86, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 2198-2200

  Tomaszewski, John E ^a   LiVolsi, Virginia A ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COST CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH CARE COST; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW;

FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMAN; NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 0033454056     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991201)86:11<2198::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Review

References (6)