Consistency of acoustic and aerodynamic measures of voice production over 28 days under various testing conditions

Journal of Voice

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 477-483

  Lee, Linda ^a   Stemple, Joseph C ^b   Kizer, Marla ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b Institute for Voice Analysis and Rehabilitation   (United States)

^c Clinton Memorial Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic; Aerodynamic; Flow rate; Fundamental frequency; Jitter; Maximum phonation time; Objective voice analysis; Phonation volume

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AIRFLOW; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOUDNESS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONATION; PITCH; VOICE; VOWEL;

EID: 0033453999     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80003-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hirano M. Clinical Examination of Voice. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
2. Fitch J. Consistency of fundamental frequency and perturbation in repeated phonations of sustained vowels, reading, and connected speech. J Speech Hear Disord. 1990;55:360-363.
3. Karnell M, Scherer R, Fischer L. Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:781-790.
4. Horii Y. Some statistical characteristics of voice fundamental frequency. J Speech Hear Res. 1975;18:192-201.
5. Horii Y. Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation. J Speech Hear Res. 1980;23:202-209.
6. Cooper M, Yanagihara N. A study of the basal pitch level variations found in the normal speaking voices of males and females. J Commun Disord. 1971;3:261-266.
7. Garrett K, Healy E. An acoustic analysis of fluctuations in the voices of normal adult speakers across three times of day. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987;82:58-62.
8. Austin M, Leeper H. Basal pitch and frequency level variation in male and female children: a preliminary investigation. J Commun Disord. 1975;8:309-316.
9. Nittrouer S, McGowan R, Milenkovic P, Beehler D. Acoustic measurements of men's and women's voices: a study of context effects and covariation. J Speech Hear Res. 1990;33:761-775.
10. Brown W, Murray T, Hughes D. Comfort effort level: an experimental variable. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976;60:696-699.
11. Colton R, Casper J. Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiologic Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
12. Woo P, Colton R, Shanghold L. Phonatory airflow analysis in patients with laryngeal disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987;96:549-555.
13. Stathopoulos E, Sapienza C. Respiratory and laryngeal function of women and men during vocal intensity variation. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36:64-75.
14. Hicks D. Functional voice assessment: What to measure and why. In: Proceedings of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Conference; Bethesda, Md; 1990.
15. Bough ID, Heuer RJ, Sataloff RT, Hills JR, Cater JR. Intrasubject variability of objective voice measures. J Voice. 1996;10:166-174.
16. Huang DZ, Minifie FD, Kasuya H, Lin SX. Measures of vocal function during changes in vocal effort level. J Voice. 1995;9:429-438.
17. Gauffin J, Sundberg J. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics. J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32:556-565.
18. Holmberg EB, Hillman RE, Perkell JS, Guiod PC, Goldman SJ. Comparisons among aerodynamic, electroglottographic, and acoustic spectral measures of female voice. J Speech Hear Res. 1995;38:1212-1223.
19. Holmberg EB, Perkell JS, Hillman RE, Gress C. Relationships between intra-speaker variation in aerodynamic measures of voice production and variation in SPL across repeated recordings. J Speech Hear Res. 1994;37:484-495.