Gerontology education: A new paradigm for the 21st century

Educational Gerontology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 479-490

  Weaver, Jan W ^a  

^a ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033453947     PISSN: 03601277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/036012799267567     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany, NY : SUNY Press.
2. Fischer, R. B., Blazey, M. L., & Lipman, H. T. (1992). Students of the third age. New York: Macmillan.
3. Friedsam, H. J., & Seltzer, M. M. (1994). An aging society: Challenge and response for higher education. In T. Hickey, P. K. Stillman, & E. B. Douglass (Eds.), Gerontology program development and evaluation (pp. 11-37). Washington, DC: Association for Gerontology in Higher Education.
4. Glendenning, F. (1992). Educational gerontology and geragogy: A critical perspective. Geragogics: European Research in Gerontological Education and Educational Gerontology, 13, 1&2, 5-21.
5. Martin, D. M., & Lyday, J. (1997). Feelings of loyalty among members of learning-inretirement programs. Educational Gerontology, 23, 315-327.
6. Moody, H. R. (1998). Aging: Concepts and controversies (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
7. National Institute on Aging. (1987). Personnel for health needs of the elderly through year 2020. (Administrative Document). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
8. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.