Teaching Medical Students to Discuss Advance Directives: A Standardized Patient Curriculum

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 142-147

  Gallagher, Thomas H ^c   Pantilat, Steven Z ^a   Lo, Bernard ^a   Papadakis, Maxine A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033453425     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TL110304     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Emanuel L, Barry M, Stoeckle J, Ettelson L, Emanuel E. Advance directives for medical care - A case for greater use. New England Journal of Medicine 1991;324:889-95.
2. Johnston S, Pfeifer M, McNutt R. The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. Archives of Internal Medicine 1995;155:1025-30.
3. Morrison R, Morrison E, Glickman D. Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives. An empiric investigation of potential barriers. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994;154:2311-8.
4. Stolman C, Gregory J, Dunn D, Levine J. Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders. Archives of Internal Medicine 1990;150:653-8.
5. Tulsky J, Chesney M, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? Journal of General Internal Medicine 1995;10:436-42.
6. Tulsky J, Chesney M, Lo B. See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996;156:1285-9.
7. Miles S, Bannick-Mohrland S, Lurie N. Advance-treatment planning discussions with nursing home residents: Pilot experience with simulated interviews. Journal of Clinical Ethics Research 1990;1:108-12.
8. Siegler M, Rezler A, Connell K. Using simulated case studies to evaluate a clinical ethics course for junior students. Journal of Medical Education 1982;57:380-5.
9. Gordon G, Tolle S. Discussing life-sustaining treatment: A teaching program for residents. Archives of Internal Medicine 1991;151:567-70.
10. Singer P, Cohen R, Robb A, Rothman A. The ethics objective structured clinical examination. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1993;8:23-8.
11. Markson L, Fanale J, Steel K, Kern D, Annas G. Implementing advance directives in the primary care setting. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994;154:2321-7.
12. Hanson L, Tulsky J, Danis M. Can clinical interventions change care at the end of life? Annals of Internal Medicine 1997;126:381-8.
13. Virmani J, Schneiderman L, Kaplan R. Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communication. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994;154:909-13.
14. Mattimore TJ, Wenger NS, Desbiens NA, et al. Surrogate and physician understanding of patients' preferences for living permanently in a nursing home. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1997;45:818-24.
15. Murphy D, Burrows D, Santilli S, et al. The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;330:545-9.
16. Lo B, McLeod G, Saika G. Patient attitudes towards discussing life-sustaining treatment. Archives of Internal Medicine 1986;146:1613-5.
17. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL, Cook EF, Epstein FH. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. New England Journal of Medicine 1983;309:579-86.
18. Moss AH. Informing patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation when the risks outweigh the benefits. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989;4:349-55.
19. Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Academic Medicine 1991;66:762-9.
20. van der Vleuten CPM, Swanson DB. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: State of the art. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1990;2:58-76.