What are we worth? Fee decisions of psychologists in private practice

Women and Therapy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 15-25

  Parvin, Ruth ^b   Anderson, Gail ^a  

^a Lutheran Social Service   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033450494     PISSN: 02703149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J015v22n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC.
2. Brown, L.S. (1990). Ethical issues and the business of therapy. In H. Lerman & N. Porter (Eds.), Feminist ethics in psychotherapy (pp. 60-69). New York: Springer.
3. Lasky, E. (1984). Psychoanalysts and psychotherapists: Conflicts about setting fees. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 4, 289-300.
4. Lasky, E. (1985). Psychotherapists' ambivalence about fees. In L.B. Rosewater & L.E.A. Walker (Eds.), Handbook of feminist therapy: Women's issues in psychotherapy (pp. 250-256). New York: Springer.
5. Lott, B. (1987). Women's lives: Themes and variations in gender learning. New York: Brooks/Cole.
6. Parvin, R., & Anderson, G. (1995). Monetary issues. In E.J. Rave & C.C. Larsen (Eds.), Ethical decision making in therapy: Feminist perspectives (pp. 57-87). New York: Guilford Press.