"Illusory" illusory conjunctions: The conjoining of features of visual and imagined stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1036-1049

  Craver Lemley, Catherine ^a   Arterberry, Martha E ^b   Reeves, Adam ^b  

^a ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033449733     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1036     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
2. Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1994). Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1068-1087.
3. Broadbent, D., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1986). Encoding speed of visual features and the occurrence of illusory conjunctions. Perception, 15, 515-524.
4. Cohen, A., & Ivry, R. B. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 650-663.
5. Craver-Lemley, C. E., Arterberry, M. E., & Reeves, A. (1997). The effects of imagery on vernier acuity under conditions of induced depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 3-13.
6. Craver-Lemley, C. E., & Reeves, A. (1987). Visual imagery selectively reduces vernier acuity. Perception, 16, 599-614.
7. Craver-Lemley, C. E., & Reeves, A. (1992). How visual imagery interferes with vision. Psychological Review, 99, 633-649.
8. Farah, M. J. (1988). Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. Psychological Review, 95, 307-317.
9. Farah, M. J., Peronnet, F., Gonon, M. A., & Girard, M. H. (1988). Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 248-257.
10. Finke, R. A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 236-259.
11. Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles in mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Finke, R. A., Johnson, M. K., & Shyi, C. W. (1988). Memory confusion for real and imagined completions of symmetrical visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 16, 133-137.
13. Finke, R. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Mental imagery acuity in the peripheral visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 244-264.
14. Intraub, H. (1985). Visual dissociation: An illusory conjunction of pictures and forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 431-442.
15. Intraub, H. (1989). Illusory conjunctions of forms, objects, and scenes during rapid serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 98-109.
16. Intraub, H., & Hoffman, J. E. (1992). Reading and visual memory: Remembering scenes that were never seen. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 101-114.
17. Ishai, A., & Sagi, D. (1995). Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. Science, 268, 1772-1774.
18. Ivry, R. B., & Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 105-116.
19. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Kosslyn, S. M., & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.
21. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.
22. Navon, D., & Ehrlich, B. (1995). Illusory conjunctions: Does inattention really matter? Cognitive Psychology, 29, 59-83.
23. Perky, C. W. (1910). An experimental study of imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 422-452.
24. Podgorny, P., & Shepard, R. N. (1978). Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 21-35.
25. Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 330-340.
26. Prinzmetal, W., Henderson, D., & Ivry, R. (1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1362-1375.
27. Segal, S. J. (1971). Imagery: Current cognitive approaches. New York: Academic Press.
28. Segal, S. J., & Fusella, V. (1970). Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 458-464.
29. Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 652-676.
31. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
32. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
33. Treisman, A. M., & Schmidt, N. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
34. Treisman, A. M., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 331-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Wallace, B. (1984). Apparent equivalence between perception and imagery in the production of various visual illusions. Memory & Cognition, 12, 156-162.