Analysis of Decision Processes with Respect to Facets of Ecological Town Planning;Prozeßanalyse von Gruppenentscheidungen zu Aspekten ökologischer Stadtplanung

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-91

  Crott, Helmut W ^a   Grotzer, Thomas ^a   Hansmann, Ralf ^a   Mieg, Harald A ^b   Scholz, Roland W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Collective judgement; Group decisions; Process analysis; Stochastic model; Town planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033449323     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//0044-3514.30.1.77     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against an unanimous majority. Psychological monographs, 70(9), 177-190.
2. Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision making. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 23-34.
3. Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bossel, H. (1994). Modellbildung und Simulation. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
5. Crott, H. W., Giesel, M., Hansmann, R. & Hoffmann, C. (1997). Soziale Urteilsbildung bei intellektuellen Aufgaben. Eine Prozeßanalyse auf Basis des PCD-Modells (Probabilistic Model of Opinion Change Including Distances). Forschungsbericht Nr. 128. Psychologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
6. Crott, H. W., Giesel, M., Hartmann, M. & Hoffmann, C. (1994). Analyse des Prozesses der kollektiven Urteilsbildung bei Problemlöseaufgaben auf der Basis eines probabilistischen Modells des Meinungswechsels (Probabilistic Model of Opinion Change Including Distances). Forschungsbericht Nr. 108. Psychologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
7. Crott, H. W., Giesel, M., Hartmann, M. & Hoffmann, C. (1995). Individuelle und kollektive Teststrategien bei Regelentdeckungsaufgaben. Forschungsbericht Nr. 118. Psychologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
8. Crott, H. W., Giesel, M. & Hoffmann, C. (1998). The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule discovery tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 938-952.
9. Crott, H. W., Szilvas, K. & Zuber, J. (1991). Group decision, choice shift and polarization in consulting, political and local political scenarios: An experimental investigation and theoretical analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 22-41.
10. Crott, H. W. & Werner, J. (1991). The norm-information-distance model: A stochastic approach to the changes in collective judgment and problem solving. Forschungsbericht Nr. 69. Psychologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
11. Crott, H. W. & Werner, J. (1994). The norm-information-distance model: A stochastic approach to preference change in group interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 68-95.
12. Crott, H. W., Werner, J. & Hoffmann, C. (1996). A probabilistic model of opinion change considering distances between alternatives: an application to mock jury data. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour, consensual action by small groups (Volume I). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
14. Davis, J. H. (1996). Group decision making and quantitive judgements: A consensus Model. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour, consensual action by small groups (Volume I). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Deutsch, M. & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
16. Gerard, A. B. & Conolly, E. S. (1972). Conformity. In: C. G. Mc Clintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology. New York, Holt: Rinehart & Winston.
17. Grotzer, T. (1998). Prozeßanalyse von Gruppenentscheidungen. Ein experimentelle Untersuchung zur Meinungsbildung am Beispiel ökologischer Stadtplanung. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. Psychologisches Institut der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
18. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Kaplan, M. F. & Miller, C. E. (1983). Group discussion and judgement. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 65-94). New York: Springer.
20. Kemney, J. G. & Snell, J. L. (1965). Finite marcov chains (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Company.
21. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the groups' road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
22. Kerr, N. L. (1982). Social transition schemes: Model, method and application. In H. Brandstätter, J. H. Davis & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making. London: Academic Press.
23. Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective Induction. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour, consensual action by small groups (Volume I). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Lamm, H. & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. XI). New York: Academic Press.
25. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
26. Maass, A., West, S. G. & Clark, R. D. (1985). Soziale Einflüsse von Minoritäten in Gruppen. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Hg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Band II: Gruppen- und Lerntheorien. Bern: Huber.
27. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
28. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
29. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 140-202). New York: Academic Press.
30. Moscovici, S. & Faucheaux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 140-202). New York: Academic Press.
31. Moscovici, S. & Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence III: Majority versus minority influence in a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 149-174.
32. Moscovici, S. & Mugny, G. (1983). Minority influence. In Paulus, P. B. (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
33. Paulus, B. (1983). Basic group processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34. Scholz, R. W., Bösch, S., Mieg, H. A. & Stünzi, J. (1997). Zentrum Zürich Nord - Stadt im Aufbruch. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag an der ETH Zürich.
35. Scholz, R. W., Flückiger, B., Schwarzenbach, R. C., Stauffacher, M. & Mieg, H. A. (1997). Environmental problem solving ability profiles in application documents of research assistants. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 37-44.
36. Shaw, M. E. (1932). A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 491-504.
37. Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
38. Stasser, G. & Davis, J. H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551.
39. Tanford, S. & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95(2), 189-225.
40. Thorndike, R. L. (1938). On what type of task will a group do well? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 409-413.
41. Werner, J. (1992). Dynamische Analyse von Gruppeninteraktionen: Simulation von Gruppendiskussionen auf der Basis des Norm-Information-Distanz-Modells. Frankfurt: Lang.
42. Witte, E. H. (1989). Sozialpsychologie. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
43. Zuber, J., Crott, H. W. & Werner, J. (1992). Choice shift and group polarisation: An analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 50-61.