Eliciting preferences for land use alternatives: A structured value referendum with approval voting

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 264-280

  McDaniels, Timothy L ^a   Thomas, Karen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033447345     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<264::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bowler, S., Donovan, T. & Happ, T. (1992). Ballot propositions and information costs: Direct democracy and the fatigued voter. The Western Political Quarterly, 45, 559-68.
2. Brams, S.J., & Fishburn, P.C. (1983). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhauser.
3. Brams, S.J., & Fishburn, P.C. (1992). Approval voting in scientific and engineering societies. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 41-45.
4. Brams, S.J. (1993). Approval voting and the good society. Political Economy of the Good Society, 3(1), 10, 14.
5. Butler, D., & Ranney, A. (Eds.). (1978). Referendums: A comparative study of practice and theory. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
6. Callow, K.A. (1990). The public hearing process: Public participation in municipal planning: A case study of the Terra Nova lands decision, Richmond, B.C. Masters dissertation, Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
7. City of Richmond (1995a). Transportation, parks and environment committee. Terra Nova West Open Space. File 2290-02-T.
8. City of Richmond (1995b). Planning Department Staff, personal communications, April-June.
9. Council discusses Terra Nova plan behind closed doors. (1994, July 31). The Richmond Review, p. 1.
10. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, D. (1980). Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Jamieson, A. (1992). Environmentally sensitive area protection in Richmond, B.C. In Tools and mechanisms for preserving green space (pp. 23-26). Proceedings from Land for Nature Forum, Federation of British Columbia Naturalists, March.
12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Economentrica, 44, 263-291.
13. Keeney, R.L. (1992). Value focused thinking. Boston: Harvard University Press.
14. Magleby, D. (1984). Direct legislation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. McDaniels, T.L. (1996). The structured value referendum: Eliciting public preferences for policy alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 227-251.
16. Merrill, S. III (1988). Making multicandidate elections more democratic. Princeton, NJ: Cambridge University Press.
17. Payne, J., Bettman, J., & Johnson, E. (1994). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Save Richmond Farmland Society (1994, February 28). Investing in our future: A city park at Terra Nova. Report presented to Richmond City Council.
19. Schkade, D., & Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness-to-pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88-109.
20. Simon, H. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 69, 129-138.
21. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
22. von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. When Disaffected Voters Have a Direct Say. (1993, January 4). Toronto Globe and Mail, p. 4. (Reprinted from The Economist, 1993).