Object-oriented computational model building of aircraft flight dynamics and systems

Aerospace Science and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 115-126

  Moormann, D ^a   Mosterman, P J ^a   Looye, G ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Aircraft modelling; Code generation; Flight controls; Flight dynamics; Flight systems; Hybrid systems; Model building; Object oriented modelling; Petri net

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033441553     PISSN: 12709638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1270-9638(99)80036-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beater P., hylib - Library of Hydraulic components for use with Dymola, Dynasim AB, Research Park Ideon, Lund, 1997.
2. Brockhaus R., Flugregelung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994.
3. Buttrill C.S., Zeiler T.A., Arbuckle P.D., Nonlinear simulation of a flexible aircraft in maneuvering flight, in: Proceedings of the AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, Monterey, CA, 1987, paper 87-2501.
4. Doll C., Magni J.-F., Looye G., Bennani S., Robustness analysis applied to autopilot design, Part 2: Evaluation of a new tool for μ-analysis, in: 21st ICAS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.
5. Elmqvist H., Dymola - Dynamic Modeling Language User's Manual, Dynasim AB, 22370 Lund, Sweden, 1993.
6. Elmqvist H., Object-oriented modeling and automatic formula Manipulation in Dymola, in: Scandinavian Simulation Society SIMS, Kongsberg, Norway, 1993.
7. Grübel G., Joos H.-D., Otter M., Finsterwalder R., The ANDECS design environment for control engineering, in: 12th IFAC World Congress, Sydney, Australia, 6, 1993, pp. 447-454.
8. SystemBuild user's guide, version 6, Integrated Systems Inc., 1998.
9. Magni J.-F., Bennani S., Terlouw J., Robust flight control, a design challenge, Lecture notes in control and information sciences, 244, Springer Verlag, 1997.
10. Looye G., Bennani S., Grübel G., Robustness analysis applied to autopilot design, Part 1: μ-analysis of design entries to a robust flight control benchmark, in: 21st ICAS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.
11. The MathWorks Inc., Simulink User's Guide, 1992.
12. Moormann D., GARTEUR research civil aircraft model (RCAM): Aircraft physical modelling leading to automatic code generation, Hypertext-document: http://www.op.dlr.de/FF-DR-ER/research/ flight/rcammod/node2.html, 1997.
13. Mosterman P.J., Otter M., Elmqvist H., Modeling Petri Nets as local constraint equations for hybrid systems using Modelica, in: SCS Summer Simulation Conference, Reno, Nevada, 1998, pp. 314-319.
14. Murata T., Petri Nets: properties, analysis and applications, in: Proceedings of the IEEE, 77 (4), 1989, pp. 541-580.
15. Otter M., DSblock: A neutral description of dynamic systems. Version 3.2, in: Technical Report TR R81-92, DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Institut für Robotik und Systemdynamik, 82234 Wessling, Germany, 1992.
16. Otter M., Elmqvist H., Energy flow modeling of mechatronic systems via Object Diagrams, in: 2nd Mathmod Vienna, IMACS Symposium on Mathematical Modelling, 1997, pp. 705-710.
17. Seebeck J., Modellierung der Redundanzverwaltung von Flugzeugen am Beispiel des ATD durch Petrinetze und Umsetzung der Schaltlogik in C-Code zur Simulationssteuerung, in: Diplomarbeit, Arbeitsbereich Flugzeugsystemtechnik, Technische Universität Hamburg-Marburg, 1998.
18. Varga A., Looye G., Moormann D., Grübel G., Automated generation of LFT-based parametric uncertainty descriptions from generic aircraft models. Mathematical Modelling of Systems 4 (4) (1998) 249-274. See also GARTEUR Report TP-088-36 at http://www.nlr.nl/public/hosted-sites/ garteur/sum36.html.
19. Waszak M.R., Schmidt D.K., Flight dynamics of aeroelastic vehicles, J. Aircraft 25 (6) (1988) 563-571.