A perturbation approach to outlier detection in two-way contingency tables

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 305-315

  Lee, Andy H ^a   Yick, John S ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Statistics and Demography Unit   (Australia)

Author keywords

Local perturbations; Masking; Outliers; Pearson goodness of fit statistic; Swamping

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033434333     PISSN: 13691473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-842x.00085     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ANDERSEN, E.B. (1992). Diagnostics in categorical data analysis. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 54, 781-791.
2. BARNETT, V. & LEWIS, T. (1994). Outliers in Statistical Data. 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley.
3. BRADU, D. & HAWKINS, D.M. (1982). Location of multiple outliers in two-way tables, using tetrads. Technometrics 24, 103-108.
4. BROWN, M.B. (1974). Identification of the sources of significance in two-way contingency tables. Appl. Statist. 23, 405-431.
5. CASJENS, L. (1974). The Prehistoric Human Ecology of Southern Ruby Valley, Nevada. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
6. COOK, R.D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 48, 133-169.
7. FUCHS, C. & KENETT, R. (1980). A test for detecting outlying cells in the multinomial distribution and two-way contingency tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75, 395-398.
8. GOODMAN, L.A. (1981). Association models and canonical correlation in the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76, 320-334.
9. HABERMAN, S.J. (1973). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics 29, 205-220.
10. KOTZE, T.J. & HAWKINS, D.M. (1984). The identification of outliers in two-way contingency tables using 2 × 2 subtables. Appl. Statist. 33, 215-223.
11. LAWRANCE, A.J. (1988). Regression transformation diagnostics using local influence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83, 1067-1072.
12. _ (1995). Deletion influence and masking in regression. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57, 181-189.
13. MOSTELLER, F. & PARUNAK, A. (1985). Identifying extreme cells in a sizable contingency table: probabilistic and exploratory approaches. In Exploring Data Tables, Trends and Shapes, eds D.C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller & J.W. Tukey, pp. 189-224. New York: Wiley.
14. MUÑOZ-GARCÍA, J., MORENO-REBOLLO, J.L. & PASCUAL-ACOSTA, A. (1987). Detecting outliers in s-multinomial distributions through adjusted residuals. J. Appl. Statist. 14, 171-176.
15. SIMONOFF, J.S. (1988). Detecting outlying cells in two-way contingency tables via backwards stepping. Technometrics 30, 339-345.
16. WU, X. & LUO, Z. (1993a). Second-order approach to local influence. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 55, 929-936.
17. _ & _ (1993b). Residual sum of squares and multiple potential, diagnostics by a second order local approach. Statist. Probab. Lett. 16, 289-296.