Image feature extraction and denoising by sparse coding

Pattern Analysis and Applications

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 104-110

  Oja, E ^a,b,c,d,e,f   Hyvarinen A ^a   Hoyer, P ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Lab of Comp and Info Science   (Finland)

^c Finnish Academy of Sciences   (Finland)

^d Intl Assoc of Pattern Recognition   (Finland)

^e European Neural Network Society   (Finland)

^f IEEE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Denoising; Feature extraction; Independent component analysis; Sparse coding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033433881     PISSN: 14337541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100440050021     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gonzalez R, Wintz P. Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, 1987
2. Daubechies I. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Math., Philadelphia, 1992
3. Mallat SG. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans on PAMI 1989; 11:674-693
4. Barlow HB. What is the computational goal of the neocortex? In C Koch and JL Davis (eds) Large-scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
5. Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 1996; 381:607-609
6. Field DJ. What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation 1994; 6:559-601
7. Hyvärinen A. Independent component analysis in the presence of gaussian noise by maximizing joint likelihood. Neurocomputing 1998; 22:49-67
8. Jutten C, Herault J. Blind separation of sources, part I: An adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture. Signal Processing 1991; 24:1-10
9. Comon P. Independent component analysis - a new concept? Signal Processing 1994; 36:287-314
10. Hyvärinen A, Oja E. A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 1997; 9(7):1483-1492
11. Oja E. The nonlinear PCA learning rule in independent component analysis. Neurocomputing 1997; 17(1):25-46
12. Hyvärinen A. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks 1999; 10(3): 626-634
13. Hyvärinen A. A family of fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'97), Munich, Germany, 1997; 3917-3920
14. The FastICA MATLAB package. Available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/ica/fastica/
15. Donoho DL, Johnstone IM, Kerkyacharian G, Picard D. Wavelet shrinkage: asymptopia? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Ser. B 1995; 57:301-337
16. Hyvärinen A, Oja E, Hoyer P, Hurri J. 1997; Image feature extraction by sparse coding and independent component analysis. In Proc Int Conf on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'98), Brisbane, Australia, 1998, 1268-1273
17. Hyvärinen A. Sparse code shrinkage: Denoising of nongaussian data by maximum likelihood estimation. Technical Report A51, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, 1998. (Available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/~aapo/pub.html).
18. Hyvärinen A. Denoising of Sensory data by maximum likelihood estimation of sparse components. In Proc Int Conf on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN'98), Skovde, Sweden, 1998; 141-146
19. Hyvärinen A, Hoyer P, Oja E. Sparse code shrinkage: Denoising by nonlinear maximum likelihood estimation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11 1999
20. Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH. Noise removal via bayesian wavelet coring. In Proc Third IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1996; 379-382