Contextual Strength Modulates the Subordinate Bias Effect: Reply to Rayner, Binder, and Duffy

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 853-855

  Vu, Hoang ^a   Kellas, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033431192     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755863     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Binder, K.S., & Rayner, K. (1998). Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 271-276.
2. Duffy, S.A., Morris, R.K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429-446.
3. Kellas, G., & Vu, H. (in press). Strength of context DOES modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
4. Martin, C., Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Metcalf, K. (this issue). Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A, 813-839.
5. Rayner, K., Binder, K.S., & Duffy, S.A. (this issue). Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: Comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 841-852.
6. Rayner, K., & Well, A. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.
7. Schwanenflugel, P.J. & Shoben, E.J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 232-252.
8. Twilley, L.C., Dixon, P., Taylor, D., & Clark, K. (1994). University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homonyms. Memory & Cognition, 22, 111-126.
9. Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S.T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition, 26, 979-1001.
10. Vu, H., Kellas, G., Metcalf, K., & Herman, R. (in press). The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory & Cognition.