Exploring a teaching/research nexus as a possible site for feminist methodological innovation in psychology

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 199-214

  Weatherall, Ann ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033430793     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00352.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bannister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
2. Bohan, J. S. (Ed.). (1992). Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women's place in psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Breakwell, G. M. (1990). Interviewing. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
4. Campbell, E., Schellenberg, G., & Senn, C.Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89-102.
5. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Kahn, A. S., & Yoder, J. D. (1989). The psychology of women and conservatism. Rediscovering social change. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 417-432.
8. Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Womens Studies International Forum, 11, 569-581.
9. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
10. Luke, C., & Gore, J. (Eds.). (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
11. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). Boston: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
12. Orner, M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for student voice in 'liberatory' education: A feminist post structuralist perspective. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74-89). New York: Routledge.
13. Paludi, MA. (1990). Exploring/Teaching the psychology of women. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14. Peplau, L. A., & Conrad, E. (1989). Beyond nonsexist research. The perils of feminist methods in psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 379-400.
15. Prilleltensky, I. (1989). Psychology and the status quo. American Psychologist, 44, 795-802.
16. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and feminist epistemology in sociology (pp. 20-60). London: Routledge.
17. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking out again. Feminist ontology and epistemology. London: Routledge
18. Unger, R., & Crawford, M. (1996). Women and gender. A feminist psychology (2nd edition). New York: McGraw Hill.
19. Walkerdine, V. (1996). Subjectivity and social class: New directions for feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 355-360.
20. Wallston, B. S., & Grady, K. E. (1985). Integrating the feminist critique and the crisis in social psychology. Another look at research methods. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender and social psychology (pp. 7-33). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Walton, M., & Weatherall, A. (1997). The metaphorical construction of sexual experience in the speech community of New Zealand university students. Unpublished manuscript, Wellington, New Zealand; Victoria University of Wellington.
22. Wilkinson, S. (1991). Why psychology (badly) needs feminism. In J. Aaron & S. Walby (Eds.), Out of the margins: Womens studies in the nineties (pp. 191-203). London: Falmer Press.
23. Worell, J., & Etaugh, C. (1994). Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 443-450.