Coping with Spatial Heterogeneity Effects on Sampling and Analysis at an HMX-Contaminated Antitank Firing Range

Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 19-28

  Jenkins, Thomas F ^a   Grant, Clarence L ^a   Walsh, Marianne E ^a   Thorne, Philip G ^a   Thiboutot, Sonia ^b   Ampleman, Guy ^b   Ranney, Thomas A ^c  

^a Engineering Research and Development Center   (United States)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA VALCARTIER   (Canada)

^c SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorimetric; Explosives; HMX; On site methods; Sampling error; Soil; Spatial heterogeneity; TNT

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033430440     PISSN: 1086900X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6521(1999)3:1<19::aid-fact3>3.0.co;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jenkins TF, Grant CL, Brar GS, Thorne PG, Schumacher PW, Ranney TA. Sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at TNT contaminated sites. Field Anal Chem Technol 1997;1:151-163.
2. Jenkins TF, Grant CL, Brar GS, Thorne PG, Ranney TA, Schumacher PW. Assessment of sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at explosives contaminated sites. U. S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 96-15, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1996.
3. Walsh ME, Jenkins TF, Schnitker PS, Elwell JW, Stutz MH. Evaluation of SW846 Method 8330 for characterization of sites contaminated with residues of high explosives. U. S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Special Report 93-5, Hanover, New Hampshire, 1993.
4. Gilbert RO. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring (1st Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1987.
5. Huesemann MH. Guidelines for the development of effective statistical soil sampling strategies for environmental applications. In: Calabrese EJ and Kostecki PT, editors. Hydrocarbon contaminated soils and groundwater. Amherst, MA: Association for the Environmental Health of Soils; 1994. Vol 4, Chap 4, p 47-96.
6. Cameron DR, Nyborg M, Toogood JA, Laverty DH. Accuracy of field sampling for soil tests. Can J Soil Sci 1971;51:165-175.
7. Fabrizio MC, Frank AM, Savino JF. Procedures for formation of composite samples from segmented populations. Environ Sci Technol 1995;29:1137-1144.
8. Garner FC, Stapanian MA, Williams LR. Composite sampling for environmental monitoring. In: Keith LH, editor. Principles of environmental sampling. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1995. p 363-374.
9. Paasivirta J, Paukku R. Use of composited samples to optimize the monitoring of environmental toxins. Chemosphere 1989;19:1551-1562.
10. Parrish RS, Ware GO, Smith CN, Banks PA. Composite sampling techniques for determining pesticide concentrations. In: Milliken GA and Schwenke JR, editors. Proceedings of the 1990 Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. Manhattan, KS: Dept. of Statistics, Kansas State Univ.; 1990. p 21-32.
11. Schaeffer DH, Kerster HW, Janardan KG. Grab versus composite sampling: A primer for the manager and engineer. Environ Manage 1980; 4:157-163.
12. Rohlf FJ, Akcakaya HR, Ferraro SP. Optimizing composite sampling protocols. Environ Sci Technol 1996;30:2899-2905.
13. Williams LR. Criteria-based approach for solicitation and selection of field-measurement technologies. Am Environ Lab 1996;8(2):36-37.
14. Crockett AB, Craig HD, Jenkins TF, Sisk WE. Field sampling and selecting on-site analytical methods for explosives in soil. Federal Facilities Forum Issue, EPA/540/R-97/501. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996. 32 p.
15. Jenkins TF, Walsh ME. Development of field screening methods for TNT, 2,4-DNT and RDX in soil. Talanta 1992;39:419-428.
16. Jenkins TF, Walsh ME, Schumacher PW, Thorne PG. Development of colorimetric field screening methods for munitions compounds in soil. In: Proceedings of Environmental Monitoring and Hazardous Waste Site Remediation Symposium, Munich, Germany, June 19-21, 1995. p 324-333.
17. U. S. EPA. Nitroaromatics and nitramines by HPLC. SW846 Method 8330, Second Update, 1995.
18. Burrows EP, Rosenblatt DH, Mitchell WR, Parmer DL. Organic explosives and related compounds: Environmental and health consideration. TR-8901. Fort Detrick, MD: USA Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory; 1989.
19. Grant CL, Jenkins TF, Myers KF, McCormick EF. J Environ Toxicol Chem 1995;14:1865-1874.
20. Horowitz W. Anal Chem 1982;54:67A-76A.
21. Jenkins TF, Walsh ME, Thorne PG, Miyares PH, Ranney TA, Grant CL, Esparza J. Site characterization at the inland firing range impact area at Ft. Ord. Special Report 98-9. Hanover, NH: U. S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory; 1997. 40 p.
22. Jenkins TF, Walsh ME, Thorne PG, Thiboutot S, Ampleman G, Ranney TA, Grant CL. Assessment of sampling error associated with collection and analysis of soil samples at a firing range contaminated with HMX. Special Report 97-22. Hanover. NH: U. S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory; 1997. 52 p.
23. Dubois C, Ampleman G, Thiboutot S, Greer C, Hawari G, Sunahara G. Bioremediation of RDX-contaminated soil: A preliminary field trial. Paper No. 97-WP101.07. Presented at the 90th Annual Air & Waste Management Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 8-13,1997.
24. Greer C, Godbout J, Zilber B, Labelle S, Sunahara G, Hawari J, Ampleman G, Thiboutot S, Dubois C. Bioremediation of RDX/HMX-contaminated soil: From flask to field. Presented at the Fourth International Symposium on In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation, April 28-May 1, 1997, New Orleans, LA, 1997.