The visual assignment of pedographic examination results to anatomical reference areas of the forefoot: A pedographic-radiological study of healthy and abnormal morphology of the forefoot

Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 219-226

  Greiner, B ^a,c   Dohle, J ^a   Schulze, W ^b   Ostermann, T ^a   Hamel, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c Orthopadische Klinik Volmarstein   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamic pedography; Forefoot; Peak pressure reading; Radiological evaluation; Visual assignment

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOREFOOT; HALLUX RIGIDUS; HALLUX VALGUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METATARSAL BONE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TOE MALFORMATION; WALKING;

EID: 0033430365     PISSN: 12687731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1999.00168.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kernozek TW, LaMott EE. Comparisons of plantar pressures between the elderly and young adults. Gait Posture 1995; 3: 143-148.
2. Milani TL, Retzlaff S. Druckverteilungsanalyse zur Beurteilung des Abrollverhaltens bei operierten Hallux valgus Patienten. (Analysis of ressure distribution for the evaluation of gait in patients with hallux valgus surgery) Z. Orthop 1994; 132 1-6.
3. Hennig EM, Rosenbaum D. Pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle 1994; 15: 35-40
4. Nicol K, Hennig EM. Time dependent method for measuring force distribution using a flexible mat as capacitor. In: Komi PV, Ed., Biomechanics V-B. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976: 433-440.
5. Schaff P, Hauser W. Dynamische Druckverteilungsmessung mit flexiblen Meßmatten- ein innovatives Meßverfahren in der Sportorthopädie und Traumatologie (Dynamic measurement of pressure distribution with flexible mats - an innovative measuring procedure in sports orthopedics and traumatology); . Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 1987, 4: 185-221.
6. Schaff PS, Cavanagh PR. Shoes for the insensitive foot: the effect of a Rocker Bottom shoe modification on plantar pressure distribution. Foot Ankle 1990; 11. 129-140.
7. Davis BL, Cothren RM, Quesada P et al Frequency content of normal and diabetic plantar pressure profiles: implications for the selection of transducer sizes. J Biomechanics 1996; 29: 979-983.
8. Hughes J. A comparison of two studies of the pressure distribution under the feet of normal subjects using different equipment. Foot Ankle 1993; 14: 514-519.
9. Nyska M, McCabe C, Linge K et al Effect of the shoe on plantar foot pressures. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 53-56.
10. Becker HP, Rosenbaum D, Kriese T et al. Gait asymmetry following successful surgical treatment of ankle fractures in young adults. Clin Orthop 1995; 311: 262-269.
11. Samnegard E, Turan I, Lanshammar H. Postoperative evaluation of Kellers arthroplasty and arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint using the EMED gait analysis system. J Foot Surg 1991; 30: 373-374.
12. Widhe T, Berggren L. Gait analysis and dynamic foot pressure in the assessment of treated clubfoot. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 186-190.
13. Hermann B. Form und Statik der Metatarsalköpfchenreihe beim Erwachsenen. Z Orthop 1995; 133: 335-340.
14. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJM et al. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomechanics 1997; 30: 243-250.
15. Nyska M, Liberson A, McCabe C et al. Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Surgery 1998; 4: 35-41.
16. Castellana A. Pathogenese und kausale Behandlung des Hallux valgus. Z Orthop 1987; 125: 77-81.