Search behaviour and mate choice by female field crickets, Gryllus integer

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1293-1298

  Wiegmann, Daniel D ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; CRICKET; MATE CHOICE;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS INTEGER; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 0033428193     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1243     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arak, A. 1983. Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 181-210. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Atkins, G., Atkins, S., Schoun, D. & Stout, J. F. 1987. Scototaxis and shape discrimination in the female cricket Acheta domesticus in an arena and on a compensatory treadmill. Physiological Entomologist, 12, 125-133.
3. Bailey, W. J., Cunningham, R. J. & Lebel, L. 1990. Song power, spectral distribution and female phonotaxis in the bushcricket Requena verticalis (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera): active choice or passive attraction. Animal Behaviour, 40, 33-42.
4. Bakker, T. C. M. & Milinski, M. 1991. Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 205-210.
5. Balmford, A. 1991. Mate choice on leks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 87-91.
6. Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. 1983. Leks and mate choice. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 109-138. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brown, L. 1981. Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae, Teleostei). Animal Behaviour, 29, 375-382.
8. Cade, W. H. 1976. Male reproductive competition and sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
9. Cade, W. 1979. The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (Ed. by M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 343-379. New York: Academic Press.
10. Cade, W. 1981. Alternative male strategies: genetic differences in crickets. Science, 212, 563-564.
11. Cade, W. & Cade, E. S. 1992. Male mating success, calling and searching behaviour at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Animal Behaviour, 43, 49-56.
12. Cade, W. & Wyatt, D. 1984. Factors affecting calling behaviour in field crickets, Teleogryllus and Gryllus (time of day, age, weight and sexual maturity). Animal Behaviour, 34, 340-346.
13. Catchpole, C. K. 1987. Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 94-97.
14. Dale, S., Rinden, H. & Slagsvold, T. 1992. Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 165-176.
15. Dombrovsky, Y. & Perrin, N. 1994. On adaptive search and optimal stopping in sequential mate choice. American Naturalist, 144, 355-361.
16. Downhower, J. F. & Lank, D. B. 1994. Effect of previous experience on mate choice by female mottled sculpins. Animal Behaviour, 47, 369-372.
17. Dyer, F. C. 1994. Spatial cognition and navigation in insects. In: Behavioral Mechanisms in Evolutionary Ecology (Ed. by L. A. Real), pp. 66-98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Gallistel, C. R. 1990. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
19. Hedrick, A. V. 1986. Female preference for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 19, 73-77.
20. Janetos, A. C. 1980. Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7, 107-112.
21. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 78, 3721-3725.
22. Luttbeg, B. 1996. A comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 451-460.
23. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. 1992. Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 250, 229-233.
24. Muller, M. & Wehner, R. 1988. Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphus fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 85, 5287-5290.
25. Otte, D. & Cade, W. 1976. On the role of olfaction in sexual and interspecies recognition in crickets (Acheta and Gryllus). Animal Behaviour, 24, 1-6.
26. Parker, G. A. 1978. Searching for mates. In: Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 141-166. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
27. Parker, G. A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 141-166. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Real, L. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist, 136, 376-404.
29. Robertson, J. G. M. 1990. Female choice increases fertilization success in the Australian frog Uperoleia laevigata. Animal Behaviour, 39, 639-645.
30. Ryan, M. J. 1985. The Túngara Frog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Sakaluk, S. K. & Cade, W. H. 1980. Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58, 404-411.
32. Seger, J. 1985. Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 39, 1185-1193.
33. Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th edn. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
34. Sokal, R. & Rohlf, F. 1981. Biometry. 2nd edn. New York: W. H. Freeman.
35. Solymar, B. & Cade, W. H. 1990. Age of first mating in field crickets, Gryllus integer (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Florida Entomologist, 73, 193-195.
36. Souroukis, K., Cade, W. H. & Rowell, G. 1992. Factors that possibly influence variation in the calling song of field crickets: temperature, time, and male size, age, and wing morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 950-955.
37. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 1997. Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Animal Behaviour, 54, 979-984.
38. Wagner, W. E. Jr, Murry, A.-M. & Cade, W. H. 1995. Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets (Gryllus integer). Animal Behaviour, 49, 1269-1281.
39. Wiegmann, D. D. & Mukhopadhyay, K. 1998. The fixed sample search rule and use of an indicator character to evaluate mate quality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 193, 709-715.
40. Wiegmann, D. D., Real, L. A., Capone, T. A. & Ellner, S. 1996. Some distinguishing features of models of search behavior and mate choice. American Naturalist, 147, 188-204.
41. Wiegmann, D. D., Mukhopadhyay, K. & Real, L. A. 1999. Sequential search and the influence of male quality on female mating decisions. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 39, 193-219.
42. Wiley, R. H. 1991. Lekking in birds and mammals: behavioral and evolutionary issues. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 20, 201-291.
43. Wittenberger, J. F. 1983. Tactics of mate choice. In: Mate Choice (Ed. by P. Bateson), pp. 435-447. New York: Cambridge University Press.