Evaluation of HIV risk reduction intervention programs via latent growth model

Evaluation Review

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 648-661

  Wang, Jichuan ^a   Siegal, Harvey A ^a   Falck, Russel S ^a   Carlson, Robert G ^a   Rahman, Ahmmed ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MALE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK-TAKING; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS;

EID: 0033426812     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841x9902300604     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allison, P. D. 1987. Estimation of linear models with incomplete data. In Sociological methodology 1987, edited by Clifford Clogg, 71-103. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
2. Allison, P. D., and R. M. Hauser. 1991. Reducing bias in estimates of linear models by remeasurement of a random subsample. Sociological Methods & Research 19(4): 466-92.
3. Brown, B. B., and G. M. Beschner with National AIDS Research Consortium. 1993. Handbook on risk of AIDS: Injection drug users and sexual partners. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
4. Chou, C. P., P. Bentler, and M. A. Pentz. 1998. Comparisons of two statistical approaches to study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling 5(3): 247-66.
5. Duncan, S. C., and T. E. Duncan. 1994. Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research 29(4): 313-38.
6. Duncan, T. E., and S. C. Duncan. 1995. Modeling the processes of development via latent variable growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling 2(3): 187-213.
7. Greene, W. H. 1990. Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.
8. Leigh, B. C., and R. Stall. 1993. Substance use and risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV: Issues in methodology, interpretation, and prevention. American Psychologist 48:1035-45.
9. McArdle, J. J. 1988. Dynamic but structural modeling of repeated measures data. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology, edited by R. B. Cattel and J. Nesselroade, 2d ed., 561-614. New York: Plenum.
10. McArdle, J. J., and E. R. Anderson. 1989. Latent growth models for research on aging. In The handbook of the psychology of aging, edited by L. E. Biren and K. W. Schaie, 3d ed., 21-44. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Meredith, W., and J. Tisak. 1990. Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55(1): 107-22.
12. Muthen, B. 1991. Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions, edited by L. M. Collins and J. L. Horn, 1-17. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Muthen, B., D. Kaplan, and M. Hollis. 1987. On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika 52:431-62.
14. Muthen, B., and A. Satorra. 1989. Multilevel aspects of varying parameters in structural models. In Multilevel analysis of educational data, edited by D. Bock, 87-99. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Siegal, H. A., R. S. Falck, R. G. Carlson, and J. Wang. 1995. Reducing HIV needle risk behaviors among injection-drug users in the Midwest: An evaluation of the efficacy of standard and enhanced interventions. AIDS Education and Prevention 7:308-19.
16. Stephens, R. C., D. D. Simpson, S. L. Coyle, C. B. McCoy, and the National AIDS Research Consortium. 1993. Comparative effectiveness of NADR interventions. In Handbook on risk of AIDS: Injection drug users and sexual partners, edited by B. S. Brown and G. M. Beschner with the National AIDS Research Consortium, 519-56. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17. Willett, H. B., and A. G. Sayer. 1994. Using covariance structural analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change overtime. Psychological Bulletin 16(2): 363-81.