Toward an empowerment zone evaluation

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 23-28

  Jenkins, Noah Temaner ^a   Bennett, Michael I J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033420272     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089124249901300104     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bowes, A. M. (1996). Evaluating an empowering research strategy: Reflections on action-research with South Asian women. Sociological Research Online, 1(1). Available: http://socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/1/1/1.html.
2. Brown, P. (1995). The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community development initiatives. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 201-225). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
3. Brown, P. (1996). Evaluation of comprehensive community-building initiatives. In R. Stone (Ed.), Core issues in comprehensive community-building initiatives (pp. 53-59). Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.
4. Deshler, D., & Ewert, M. (1995). Participatory action research: Traditions and major assumptions. PARnet.org. [On-line]. Available: http://www.PARnet.org/parchive/docs/deshler_95.
5. Gaventa, J. (1996). The benefit of participatory evaluation. In R. Stone (Ed.), Core issues in comprehensive community-building initiatives (pp. 62-63). Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.
6. Girard, K. (1996). On the path of engaged evaluation: A personal response. In R. Stone (Ed.), Core issues in comprehensive community-building initiatives (pp. 64-66). Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.
7. Gittell, M., Newman, K., Bockmeyer, J., & Lindsay, R. (1998). Expanding civic opportunity: Urban empowerment zones. Urban Affairs Review, 33(4), 530-558.
8. Littrell, D. W. (1985). An introduction to action research in community development. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, 2, 187-195.
9. Mier, R., & Bingham, R. (1993). Metaphors of economic development. In R. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Theories of local economic development: Perspectives from across the disciplines (pp. 284-304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Nathan, R. P. (1982). The methodology for field network evaluation studies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
11. O'Connor, A. (1995). Evaluating comprehensive community initiatives: A view from history. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L.B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 23-64). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
12. Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action-research. London: Sage Ltd.