The Effect of Positive or Negative Frame on the Choices of Students in School Psychology and Educational Administration

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 148-162

  Fagley, N S ^a   Miller, Paul M ^b   Jones, Robert N ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b New Century Education   (United States)

^c Jordan School District (UT)   (Jordan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033418144     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0089002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baraett, D. W. (1988). Professional judgment: A critical appraisal. School Psychology Review, 17, 658-672.
2. Christensen, C., Heckerling, P. S., Mackesy, M. E., Bernstein, L. M., & Elstein, A. S. (1991). Cognitive structures of experts and novices: Framing bias among expert and novice physicians. Academic Medicine, 66(Suppl. 9), 76-78.
3. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Davidow, J., & Levinson, E. M. (1993). Heuristic principles and cognitive bias in decision making: Implications for assessment in school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 351-361.
7. Deno, S. L. (1995). School psychologist as problem solver. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology - III (pp. 471-484). Washington, DC: NASP.
8. Fagley, N. S. (1988). Judgmental heuristics: Implications for the decision making of school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 17, 311-321.
9. Fagley, N. S., & Kruger, L. (1986, August). Framing effects on the program choices of school psychologists. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
10. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1987). The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs. certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 264-277.
11. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496-510.
12. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 355-373.
13. Gallagher, J. J. (1994). Teaching and learning: New models. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 171-195.
14. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1994). Thinking and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
15. Gnys, J. A., Willis, W. G., & Faust, D. (1995). School psychologists' diagnoses of learning disabilities: A study of illusory correlation. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 59-73.
16. Gutkin, T. B., & Nemeth, C. (1997). Selected factors impacting decision making in prereferral intervention and other school-based teams: Exploring the intersection between school and social psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 195-216.
17. Highhouse, S., & Paese, P. W. (1996). Problem domain and prospect frame: Choice under opportunity versus threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 124-132.
18. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1982). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
19. Jackson, D. N., Hourany, L., & Vidmar, N. J. (1971). A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking (Research Bulletin No. 185). University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
20. Jackson, D. N., Hourany, L., & Vidmar, N. J. (1972). A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking. Journal of Personality, 40, 483-501.
21. Jones, R. N., Sheridan, S. M., & Binns, W. R. (1993). School-wide social skills training: Providing preventive services to students at-risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 57-80.
22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
23. Maule, A. J. (1995). Framing elaborations and their effects on choice behavior: A comparison across problem isomorphs and participants with different levels of expertise. In J. P. Caverni, M. Bar-Hillel, F. H. Barron, & H. Jungermann (Eds.), Contributions to decision making - I (pp. 281-300). New York: Elsevier.
24. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
25. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 517-522.
26. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1992, November). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, St. Louis, MO.
27. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1995, July). The public's response to framing and arena of outcome: Money versus lives. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, New York City, NY.
28. Miller, P. M., Fagley, N. S., & Jones, R. N. (1987, August). School administrators: Are they risk averse and influenced by problem framing? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York City.
29. O'Connor, A. M. C., Boyd, N. F., Tritchler, D. L., Kriukov, Y., Sutherland, H., & Till, J. E. (1985). Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug treatments: The influence of framing, medium, and rater variables. Medical Decision Making, 5, 453-463.
30. Roszkowski, M. J., & Snelbecker, G. E. (1990). Effects of "framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 237-246.
31. Schneider, S. (1992). Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1040-1057.
32. Shanteau, J., & Stewart, T. R. (1992). Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 95-106.
33. Shure, G. H., & Meeker, R. J. (1967). A personality/attitude schedule for use in experimental bargaining studies. Journal of Psychology, 65, 233-252.
34. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.