Relations among corporate social responsibility, financial soundness, and investment value in 22 manufacturing industry groups

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 331-347

  Heinze, David ^a   Sibary, Scott ^a   Sikula Sr , Andrew ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Ethics; Financial soundness; Investment value; Morals

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033412664     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0904_4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Aupperle, K. E., & Carroll, A. B. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446-463.
2. Bromiley, P., & Marcus, A. (1989). The deterrent to dubious corporate behavior: Profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 233-250.
3. Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's "most admired" companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1347-1359.
4. Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1995). Some additional thoughts on halo-removed Fortune residuals. Business &. Society, 34, 236-240.
5. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 42-56.
6. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5-14.
7. Dean, K. L. (1998). The chicken and the egg revisited: Ties between corporate social performance and the financial outcomes. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 99-101.
8. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36, 5-31.
9. Hammond, S. A., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1996). The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 159-165.