Response time and word recognition using a modified-rhyme monitoring task: List equivalency and time-order effects

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 515-520

  Mackersie, Carol ^a,b   Neuman, Arlene C ^a   Levitt, Harry ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0033408343     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199912000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baer, T., Moore, B. C. J., & Gatehouse, S. (1993). Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response time. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 30, 49-72.
2. Brandy, W. T. (1966). Reliability of voice tests of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 281-287.
3. Downs, D. W., & Crum, M. A. (1978). Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 702-714.
4. Gatehouse, S. (1993). Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 4, 296-306.
5. Gatehouse, S., & Gordon, J. (1990). Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 63-68.
6. Hecker, M. H. L., Stevens, K. N., & Williams, C. E. (1966). Measurements of reaction time in intelligibility tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 1188-1189.
7. House, A. S., Williams, C. E., Hecker, M. H. L., & Kryter, K. D. (1965). Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed response set. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158-166.
8. Kruel, E. J., Bell, D. W., & Nixon, J. C. (1969). Factors affecting speech discrimination test difficulty. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 281-287.
9. Kruel, E. J., Nixon, J. C., Kryter, K. D., Bell, D. W., & Lang, J. S. (1968). A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 536-552.
10. Mackersie, C. L. Neuman, A. C., & Levitt, H. (1999). A comparison of response time and word recognition measures using a word monitoring and closed-set identification task. Ear and Hearing, 20, 140-148.
11. Pisoni, D. B., Manous, L. M., & Dedina, M. J. (1987). Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: Effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 303-320.
12. Pratt, R. L. (1981). On the use of reaction time as a measure of intelligibility. British Journal of Audiology, 15, 253-255.
13. Studebaker, G. A. (1985). A "Rationalized" arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 455-462.
14. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
15. Wright, R., Spanner, M., & Martin, M. (1981). Pilot experiments with a reaction time audiometer. British Journal of Audiology, 15, 275-281.