Digital terrain modeling of small stream channels with a total-station theodolite

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 41-48

  Keim, Richard F ^a   Skaugset, Arne E ^a   Bateman, Douglas S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel morphology; Digital terrain model; Mapping

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL; HYDROLOGY; STREAM CHANNEL;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033407640     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00007-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bisson PA, Nielson JL, Palmason RA, Grove LE. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low stream flow. In: Armantrout NB, editor. Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 1982.
2. Carter JR. Digital representations of topographic surfaces. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sensing 1988;54:1577-580.
3. Heimann DC. Recruitment trends and physical characteristics of coarse woody debris in oregon coast range streams. MS Thesis, Oregon State University, 1988.
4. Hogan DL, Church M. Hydraulic geometry in small, coastal streams: progress toward quantification of salmonid habitat. Canadian J Fish Aquatic Sci 1989;46:844-52.
5. Huang Y-P. Triangular irregular network generation and topographical modeling. Computers in Industry 1989;12:203-13.
6. Kellie AC. Field comparison of electronic and optical survey systems. Surveying and Land Information Sys 1994;54:26-32.
7. Lambin EF. Change detection at multiple temporal scales: seasonal and annual variations in landscape variables. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sensing 1996;62:931-38.
8. Lane SN, Chandler JH, Richards KS. Developments in monitoring and modeling small-scale river bed topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 1994;19:349-68.
9. Lienkaemper GW, Swanson FJ. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth douglas-fir forests. Canad J Forest Res 1986;17:150-56.
10. Lisle TE. Using "residual depths" to monitor pool depths independently of discharge. USDA Forest Service Research Note PSW-394, 1987.
11. Lombard PJ. Effects of the size and orientation of large wood on pool volume in two Oregon coast range streams. MS Thesis. Oregon State University, 1997.
12. Malanson GP, Butler DR. Woody debris, sediment, and riparian vegetation of a subalpine river, Montana, USA. Arctic and Alpine Res 1990;22:183-94.
13. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 1991;5:3-30.
14. Platts WS, Megehan WF, Minshall GW. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-183, 1983.
15. Robison EG. Reach scale sampling metrics and longitudinal pattern adjustments of small streams. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University, 1997.
16. Robison EG, Beschta RL. Estimating stream cross-sectional area from wetted width and thalweg depth. Physical Geography 1989;10:190-98.
17. Rosgen DL. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 1994;22:169-99.
18. Simonson TD, Lyons J, Kanehl PD. Quantifying fish habitat in streams: transect spacing, sample size, and a proposed framework. North Am J Fisheries Manage 1994;24:607-15.
19. Stack WR, Beschta RL. Factors influencing pool morphology in Oregon coastal streams. In Woessner WW, editor. Proceedings of a Symposium on Headwaters Hydrology. American Water Resources Association, Missoula, MT, 1989.
20. Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Uehara G. Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv Agronomy 1985;38:45-94.
21. Turner MG, O'Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1989;3:153-62.
22. Wing MG, Keim RF, Skaugset AE. Using geostatistics to quantify large woody debris distribution in streams. Computers & Geosciences, In press.