Separating analysis from politics: Acid rain in Europe

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 104-137

  Patt, Anthony ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID RAIN; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

ACID RAIN; AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; ETHNOLOGY; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT; HISTORY; LEGAL ASPECT; NATURAL SCIENCE; POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ACID RAIN; AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; ECONOMICS; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; NATURAL SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EUROPE;

EID: 0033406435     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00880.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ågren, C. 1998a. Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Ram. Email to the author.
2. Ågren, C. 1998b. Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain. Telephone interview with the author.
3. Alcamo, J., P. Kauppi, et al. 1984. Acid Rain in Europe: A framework to assist decision making. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
4. Amann, M. 1998. Transboundary Air Pollution project director, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Interview with the author.
5. Amann, M., I. Bertok, et al. 1997. Third Interim Report: Cost-effective control of acidification and ground level ozone. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
6. Amann, M., I. Bertok, et al. 1996. First Interim Report: Cost effective control of acidifcation and ground level ozone. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
7. Amann, M., I. Bertok, et al. 1996. Second Interim Report: Cost effective control of acidifcation and ground level ozone. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
8. 2 Emissions in Europe. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
9. ApSimon, H. 1998. Centre for Environmental Technology, Imperial College, London. Email to the author.
10. ApSimon, H. and R. Warren 1997. Abatement Strategies to Reduce Particulate Concentrations across Europe. London, Imperial College.
11. ApSimon, H., R. Warren, et al. 1994. “The abatement strategies assessment model—ASAM: Applications to reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions across Europe. Atmospheric Environment 28(4): 649–663.
12. 2 abatement policies in Europe: Some examples. Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
13. Borrell, P. 1998. Scientific Secretary, EUROTRAC, Germany. Interview with the author.
14. Breyer, S. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Chadwick, M. J. and J. C. I. Kuylenstierna 1990. The relative sensitivity of ecosystems in Europe to acidic depositions, A preliminary assessment of the sensitivity of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. York, Stockholm Environmental Institute at York.
16. Council of the European Union 1997. Council conclusions on a Community strategy to combat acidification. Brussels, The Council of the European Union.
17. Dietrich, W. 1995. The challenge of selecting environmental policy goals: Case studies regarding the use of critical levels. Cambridge, Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University.
18. Dryzek, J. 1997. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Eliassen, A. 1998. Norwegian Meteorological Institute. Interview with the author.
20. Førsund, F. 1998. Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Email to the author.
21. Gillroy, J. and M. Wade, (Eds.) 1992. The Moral Dimensions of Public Policy Choice Beyond the Market Paradigm. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22. 2 and VOCs. Ambio 23(7): 425–433.
23. Haas, P., R. Keohane, et al., (Eds.) 1993. Institutions for the Earth Sources of Effective Environmental Protection. Global Environmental Accord Series. Cambridge, MIT Press.
24. Hanley, N. and C. Spash 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot: NY: Edward Alger Publishing Limited.
25. Holland, M. and W. Krewitt 1996. Benefits of an acidifcation strategy for the European Union, Draft 3. Brussels, European Commission Directorate General XII.
26. Hordijk, L. 1998. Wageningen Institute for Environment and Climate Research, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands; former Head of IIASA 's Transboundary Air Pollution Project; former chair of the LRTAP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modeling. Interview with the author.
27. Kakebeeke, W. 1998. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, the Netherlands. Interview with the author.
28. Kelman, S. 1992. “Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique.” In J. Gilroy and M. Wade, (Eds.) The Moral Dimensions of Public Policy Choice Beyond the Market Paradigm. pp. 153–164. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29. Klaassen, G. and H. M. A. Jansen 1989. Economic Principles for Allocating the Costs of Reducing Sulphur Emissions in Europe. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Group of Economic Experts on Air Pollution.
30. Levy, M. 1993. “European acid rain: The power of tote-board diplomacy.” In P. Haas, R. Keohane and M. Levy, (Eds.) Institutions for the Earth Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, pp. 75–132. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31. Litfin, K. 1994. Ozone Discourses. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Nilsson, J. and P. Grennfelt 1988. Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers.
33. Odén, S. 1968. The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences in the Natural Environment. Stockholm, Swedish National Science Research Council.
34. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1981. The costs and benefits of sulphur dioxide control: A methodological study. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
35. Pearce, D. 1998. University College, London; Chair, LRTAP Task Force on Economic Aspects of Abatement Strategies. Letter to the author.
36. Pearce, D. and C. Nash 1981. The Social Appraisal of Projects: A Text in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education Ltd.
37. Schulz, W. 1985. Bessere Luft, was ist sie uns wert? Eine gesellschaftliche Bedarfsanalyse auf der Basis individueller Zahlungsbereitschaften. Berlin, Umweltbundesamt.
38. SEI 1991. An outline of the Stockholm Environmental Institute's Coordinated Abatement Strategy Model, CASM. Heslington, York, U.K, Stockholm Environmental Institute at York.
39. Shrader-Frechette, K. and E. McCoy 1993. Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Sliggers, J. 1998. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, the Netherlands. Interview with the author.
41. Tietenberg, T. 1988. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. second edition. Glenview: Scott Foresman & Co.
42. Tribe, L. 1992. “Policy Science: Analysis or Ideology.” In J. Gilroy and M. Wade, (Eds.) The Moral Dimensions of Public Policy Choice Beyond the Market Paradigm, pp. 115–151. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43. UN-ECE 1981. Methodological approach to the economic assessment of environmental damages. Geneva, Senior advisors to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe governments on environmental problems.
44. UN-ECE 1982. Cost-benefit analysis of alternative programmes for sulphur emissions control in the ECE region: Methodological approach and data requirements. Geneva, Interim Executive Body for the Convention on the Long-Range Transport of Air Pollution.
45. UN-ECE 1983. Meeting on cost-benefit analysis of sulphur emission control. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution.
46. UN-ECE 1985. Report of the Second Session. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Group of Experts on Cost and Benefit Analysis.
47. x abatement strategies. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Group of Economic Experts on Air Pollution.
48. UN-ECE 1990. Economic Benefits of a Cleaner Environment. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Group of Economic Experts on Air Pollution.
49. UN-ECE 1991. Report of the Seventh Session. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Group of Experts on Air Pollution.
50. UN-ECE 1992. Economic Aspects of Abatement Strategies. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies.
51. UN-ECE 1993. Economic Aspects of Abatement Strategies. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies.
52. UN-ECE 1995. Economic evaluation of benefits of abating nitrogen oxides and related substances. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies.
53. UN-ECE 1998. Economic assessment of benefits. Geneva, United Nations Economic Committee for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Working Group on Strategies.
54. Wüster, H. 1998. Secretary for Working Group on Strategies, LRTAP Secretariat, UN-ECE, Geneva. Interview with the author.
55. Zeckhauser, R. and W. Viscusi 1990. “Risk within reason. Science 248:559–564.