Use of the Bronsted equation in the interpretation of micellar effects in kinetics. Study of the reaction [Fe(CN)5(4-CNpy)]3- + CN- ⇆ Fe(CN)64- + 4-CNpy in SDS micellar solutions

New Journal of Chemistry

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1203-1207

  Muriel Delgado, Fernando ^a   Jiménez, Rafael ^a   Gómez Herrera, Carlos ^a   Sánchez, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; FERRICYANIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MICELLE; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033406343     PISSN: 11440546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/a903271a     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 1 C. Bravo, P. Hervés and J. R. Leis, J. Phys. Chem., 1990, 94, 8816.
2. 2 (a) C. A. Bunton, in Kinetics and Catalysis in Microheterogeneus Systems, eds. M. Grätzel and K. Kalyanasundaram, Marcel Dekker, New York 1991, vol. 38, ch. 2.
3. (b) H. Chaimovich, F. M. V. Alexio, I. M. Cuccovia, D. Zanette and F. H. Quina, in Solution Behavior of Surfactants: Theorecal and Applied Aspects, eds. K. L. Mittal and E. J. Fendler, Plenum Press, New York, 1982, vol. 2, p. 949.
4. 3 E. Pelizzetti, E. Fisicaro, C. Minero, A. Sassi and H. Hidaka, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 1991.
5. 4 N. Menschutkin, Z. Phys. Chem., 1890, 6, 41.
6. 5 M. Pudlak, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 5621.
7. 6 R. Barchini and R. Pottel, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 7899.
8. 7 Y. Ohsawa, Y. Shimazki and S. Aoyagui, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1980, 114, 235.
9. 8 F. M. Menger and C. E. Portnoy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89, 4698.
10. 9 See for example: (a) C. A. Bunton, L. S. Romsted and L. Sepulveda, J. Phys. Chem., 1980, 84, 2611;
11. (b) M. Gonsalves, S. Probst, M. C. Rezende, F. Nome, C. Zucco and D. Zanette, J. Phys. Chem., 1985, 89, 1127;
12. (c) F. Ortega and E. Rodenas, J. Phys. Chem., 1986, 90, 2408;
13. (d) M. A. B. Marin, F. Nome, D. Zanette, C. Zucco and L. S. Romsted, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 10879.
14. 10 C. A. Bunton, J. Mol. Liq., 1997, 72, 231.
15. 11 A. R. Olson and J. R. J. Simonson, J. Chem. Phys., 1949, 17, 1167.
16. 12 J. N. Brönsted, Z. Phys. Chem., 1922, 102, 169 and 1925, 115, 337 .
17. 12 J. N. Brönsted, Z. Phys. Chem., 1922, 102, 169 and 1925, 115, 337 .
18. 13 See for example: K. J. Laidler, Chemical Kinetics, McGraw-Hill, London, 1965, p. 219.
19. 14 H. E. Toma, Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1975, 37, 785.
20. 15 G. Braver, Handbook of Preparative Inorganic Chemestry, Academic Press, New York, 2nd edn., 1965, vol. 2, p. 1511.
21. 16 4-Cyanopyridine was purified by recrystallization in a 1:1 ethanol-water mixture using standard procedures.
22. 17 R. Juretic, D. Paulovic and S. Asperger, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 2029.
23. 18 The first term on the right hand side of eqn. (12) would correspond to the Debye-Hückel law of variation of activity coefficient. The Φ([T]) term corresponds to the so-called "excluded volume effects". This term corrects the approximation used in obtaining the Debye-Hückel equation: in deriving this equation all the ions in the solution, except the central one, are considered as point charges. This is a good approximation when one is dealing with dilute solutions of small ions. Otherwise, it is necessary to correct the Debye-Hückel equation because of the effects derived from this approximation. In fact, when the excluded volume effects are corrected by fitting the experimental data, as in this paper, other effects are also corrected such as those derived from changes in the dielectric constant of the medium caused by the supporting electrolytes (or micelles).
24. 19 J. Koryta, J. Dvorak and V. Bohackova, Electrochemistry, Methuen, London, 1970, p. 32.
25. 1/2) ≫ 1 and the term containing the square roots in eqn. (14) has a constant value of A/B.
26. 21 G. Scatchard, US Natl. Bur. Stand., 1953, 534, 185.