Psychological factors related to stage of mammography adoption

Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1313-1321

  Brenes, Gretchen A ^a,c   Skinner, Celette Sugg ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

EID: 0033404022     PISSN: 15246094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.1313     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q 1984;11:1.
2. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q 1988;15:175.
3. Curry SJ, Emmons KM. Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Dehav Med 1994;16:302.
4. Champion VL. Deliefs about breast cancer and mammography by behavioral stage. Oncol Nurs Forum 1994;21:1009.
5. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390.
6. Champion VL. Strategies to increase mammography utilization. Med Care 1994;32:118.
7. Rakowski W, Ehrich D, Goldstein MG, et al. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med 1998;27:748.
8. Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H. Physicians' recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health 1994; 84:43.
9. Rakowski W, Andersen MR, Stoddard AM, et al. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol 1997;16:433.
10. Rakowski W, Dube CD, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DB. Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychol 1992;11:111.
11. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP. Women's decision making about mammography: A replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychol 1993;12:209.
12. Skinner CS, Champion VL, Gonin R, Hanna M. Do perceived barriers and benefits vary by mammography stage? Psychol Health Med 1997;2:65.
13. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 1990;19:279.
14. Rimer BK, Trock B, Lerman C, King E, Engstrom PF. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 1991;7:69.
15. Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA. Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Rep 1993;108:605.
16. Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nicholls WL, Waksberg J, eds. Telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley, 1988.
17. Fowler FJ. Survey research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1983.
18. Wilcox S, Storandt M. Relations among age, exercise, and psychological variables in a community sample of women. Health Psychol 1996;15:110.
19. Skinner CS, Arfken CL, Sykes RK. Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women. Am J Prev Med 1998;14: 54.
20. Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci 1984;6:73.
21. Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res 1993;42:139.
22. Brouwers MC, Sorrentino RM. Uncertainty orientation and protection motivation theory: The role of individual differences in health compliance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:102.
23. Fruin DJ, Pratt C, Owen N. Protection motivation theory and adolescents' perceptions of exercise. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992;22:55.
24. Maddux JE, Norton LW, Stoltenberg CD. Self-efficacy expectancy, outcome expectancy, and outcome value: Relative effects on behavioral intentions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:783.
25. Brenes GA. The effects of message frame, perceived risk, and response efficacy on mammography compliance [Dissertation]. St. Louis, MO: Washington University, 1998.
26. Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol 1994;13:122.
27. Rutledge DN, Hartmann WH, Kinman PO, Winfield AC. Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors. Prev Med 1988;17:412.
28. Cole SR, Bryant CA, McDermott RJ, Sorrell C, Flynn M. Beliefs and mammography screening. Am J Prev Med 1997;13:439.
29. Glanz K, Resch N, Lerman C, Blake A, Gorchov PM, Rimer BK. Factors associated with adherence to breast cancer screening among working women. J Occup Med 1992;34:1071.
30. Champion V, Huster G. Effect of interventions on stage of mammography adoption. J Behav Med 1995; 18:169.
31. Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health 1994;84:62.
32. Caplan LS, Wells BL, Haynes S. Breast cancer screening among older racial/ethnic minorities and whites: Barriers to early detection. J Gerontol 1992;47:101.
33. Etzi S, Lane DS, Grimson R. The use of mammography vans by low-income women: The accuracy of self-reports. Am J Public Health 1994;84:107.
34. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health 1990;80:1386.
35. McGovern PG, Lurie N, Margolis KL, Slater JS. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med 1998;14:201.
36. Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, et al. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: The accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health 1996; 86:1016.