Cngsc, a homologue of goosecoid, participates in the patterning of the head, and is expressed in the organizer region of Hydra

Development

Volumn 126, Issue 23, 1999, Pages 5245-5254

  Broun, Mariya ^a   Sokol, Sergei ^b   Bode, Hans R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Goosecoid; Head formation; Hydra; Spatial patterning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COELENTERATE; DROSOPHILA; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE ISOLATION; HEAD; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY NERVE CELL; VERTEBRATE; XENOPUS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CLONING, MOLECULAR; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXTREMITIES; FEMALE; FETAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GOOSECOID PROTEIN; HEAD; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HYDRA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; ORGANIZERS, EMBRYONIC; REGENERATION; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; T-BOX DOMAIN PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; XENOPUS;

ANIMALIA; COELENTERATA; EUKARYOTA; HYDRA; INVERTEBRATA; PROTOZOA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0033402723     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Artinger, M., Blitz, I., Inoue, K., Tran, U. and Cho, K. W. (1997). Interaction of goosecoid and brachyury in Xenopus mesoderm patterning. Mech. Dev. 65, 187-96.
2. Berking, S. (1980). Commitment of stem cells to nerve cells and migration of nerve cell precursors in preparatory bud development in Hydra. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 60, 373-387.
3. Blum, M., Gaunt, S. J., Cho, K. W., Steinbeisser, H., Blumberg, B., Bittner, D. and De Robertis E.M.(1992). Gastrulation in the mouse: the role of the homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 69, 1097-1106.
4. Blumberg, B., Wright, C. V. E., De Robertis, E. M. and Cho, K. W. Y. (1991). Organizer-specific homeobox genes in Xenopus leavis embryos. Science 253, 194-196.
5. Bode, H. R., Flick, K. M. and Smith, G. S. (1976). Regulation of interstitial cell differentiation in Hydra attenuata. I. Homeostatic control of interstitial cell population size. J. Cell Sci. 20, 29-46.
6. Bode, H., Berking, S., David, C. N., Gierer, A., Schaller, H. and Trenkner, E. (1973). Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth and morphogenesis in Hydra. Wilhelm Roux Arch. EntwMech. Org. 171, 269-285.
7. Bode, P. M., Awad, T. A., Koizumi, O., Nakashima, Y., Grimmelikhuizen, C. J. P. and Bode, H.R. (1988). Development of the two-part pattern during regeneration of the head in hydra. Development 102, 223-235.
8. Browne, E. N. (1909). The production of new hydranths in hydra by the insertion of small grafts. J. Exp. Zool. 8, 1-33.
9. Campbell, R. D. (1967). Tissue dinamics of steady state growth in Hydra littoralis. II. Pattern of tissue movement. J. Morph. 121, 19-28.
10. Cho, K. W. Y., Blumberg, B., Steinbeisser, H., and De Robertis, E. M. (1991). Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67, 1111-1120.
11. David, C. N. and Campbell, R. D. (1972). Cell cycle kinetics and development of Hydra attenuata. J. Cell. Sci. II, 557-568.
12. Diehl, F. A., and Burnett, A. L. (1964). The role of interstitial cells in the maintenance of hydra. II. Budding. J. Exp. Zool. 158, 283-298.
13. Endl, I., Lohmann, J. U. and Bosch, T. C. (1999). Head-specific gene expression in Hydra: complexity of DNA-protein interactions at the promoter of ksI is inversely correlated to the head activation potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1445-1450.
14. Filosa, S., Rivera-Perez, J. A., Gomez, A. P., Gansmuller, A., Sasaki, H., Behringer, R. R. and Ang, S. L. (1997). Goosecoid and HNF-3beta genetically interact to regulate neural tube patterning during mouse embryogenesis. Development 124, 2843-2854.
15. Frigerio, G., Burri, M., Bopp, D., Baumgartner, S. and Noll, M. (1986). Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network. Cell 47, 735-746.
16. Frohman, M. A. (1993). Rapid amplification of complementary DNA ends for generation of full-length complementary DNAs: thermal RACE. Methods Enzymol 218, 340-356.
17. Galili, N., Baldwin, S., Lund, J., Reeves, R., Gong, W., Wang, Z., Roe, B.A., Emanuel, B. S., Nayak, S., Mickanin, C., Budarf, M. L. and Buck, C. A. (1997). A Region of mouse chromosome 16 is syntenic to the DiGeorge, Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome Minimal Critical Region. Genome Res., 7, 17-26.
18. Gaunt, S. J., Blum, M. and De Robertis, E. M. (1993). Expression of the mouse goosecoid gene during mid-embryogenesis may mark mesenchymal cell lineages in the developing head, limbs and body wall. Development 117, 769-778.
19. Goriely, A., Stella, M., Coffinier, C., Kessler, D., Mailhos, C., Dessain, S. and Desplan, C. (1996). A functional homologue of goosecoid in Drosophila. Development 122, 1641-1650.
20. Grens, A., Gee, L., Fisher, D. A. and Bode, H. R. (1996). CnNK-2, an NK-2 homeobox gene, has a role in patterning the basal end of the axis in hydra. Dev. Biol. 180, 473-488.
21. Hahn, M. and Jackle, H. (1996). Drosophila goosecoid participates in neural development but not in body axis formation. EMBO J 15, 3077-3084.
22. Isshiki, T., Takeichi, M. and Nose, A. (1997). The role of the msh homeobox gene during Drosophila neurogenesis: implication for the dorsoventral specification of the neuroectoderm. Development 124, 3099-3109.
23. Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., De Robertis, E. M., Storey, K. G. and Stern, C. D. (1993). The homeobox gene goosecoid and the origin of organizer cells in the early chick blastoderm. Cell 74, 645-659.
24. Koizumi, O., Heimfeld, S. and Bode, H. R. (1988). Plasticity in the nervous system of adult hydra. II. Conversion of ganglion cells of the body column into epidermal sensory cells of the hypostome. Dev. Biol. 129, 358-371.
25. Kuzuoka, M., Takahashi, T., Guron, C. and Raghow, R. (1994). Murine homeobox-containing gene. Msx-I: analysis of genomic organization, promoter structure, and potential autoregulatory cis-acting elements. Genomics 21, 85-91.
26. Lemaire, L., Roeser, T., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C. and Kessel, M. (1997). Segregating expression domains of two goosecoid genes during the transition from gastrulation to neurulation in chick embryos. Development 124, 1443-1452.
27. Li, H. P. and Yao, T. (1945). Studies on the organizer problem in Pelmatohydra oligactis. III. Bud induction by the developing hypostome. J. Exp. Biol. 21, 155-160.
28. MacWilliams, H.K. (1983a). Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of hydra head regeneration. II. Properties of the head inhibition. Dev. Biol. 96, 217-238.
29. MacWilliams, H.K. (1983b). Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of hydra head regeneration. Properties of the head activation. Dev Biol. 96, 239-257.
30. Martinez, D. E., Dirksen, M. L., Bode, P. M., Jamrich, M., Steele, R. E. and Bode, H. R. (1997). Budhead, a fork head/HNF-3β homologue, is expressed during axis formation and head specification in hydra. Dev. Biol. 192, 523-536.
31. Meinhardt, H. A. (1993). Model for pattern formation of hypostome, tentacles, and foot in hydra: how to form structures close to each other, how to form them at a distance. Dev. Biol. 157, 321-333.
32. Meinhardt, H. and Gierer, A. (1974). Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J. Cell Sci. 15, 321-346.
33. Mitgutsch, C., Hauser, F., Grimmelikhuijzen, C. J. (1999). Expression and developmental regulation of the hydra-RFamide and hydra-LWamide preprohormone genes in hydra: evidence for transient phases of head formation. Dev. Biol. 207, 189-203.
34. Mokady, O., Dick, M. H., Lackschewitz, D., Schierwater, B. and Buss, L. W. (1998). Over one-half billion years of head conservation? Expression of an ems class gene in Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 95, 3673-3678.
35. Muller, W. A. (1989). Diacylglycerol-induced multihead formation in Hydra. Development 105, 309-316.
36. Newport, J. and Kirschner, M. (1982). A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos. I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30, 675-686.
37. Niehrs, C., Keller, R., Cho, K. W. and De Robertis, E. M. (1993). The homeobox gene goosecoid controls cell migration in Xenopus embryos. Cell 72, 491-503.
38. Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber J. (1967). Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North Holland Publ.
39. Nirenberg, M., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, N., Kim, Y., Mellerick, D., Wang, L. H., Webber, K. O. and Lad, R. (1995). The NK-2 homeobox gene and the early development of the central nervous system of Drosophila. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 758, 224-242.
40. Otto, J. and Campbell, R. (1977). Budding in Hydra attenuata: Bud stages and fate map. J. Exp. Zool. 200, 417-428.
41. Poole, S. J., Kauvar, L. M., Drees, B. and Kornberg, T. (1985). The engrailed locus of Drosophila: structural analysis of an embryonic transcript. Cell 40, 37-43.
42. Regulski, M., McGinnis, N., Chadwick, R. and Mcginnis, W. (1987). Developmental and molecular analysis of Deformed; a homeotic gene controlling Drosophila head development. EMBO J. 6, 767-777.
43. Sack, P. G. and Davis, L. E. (1979). Production of nerveless hydra attenuata by hydroxyurea treatments. J. Cell. Sci. 37, 189-203.
44. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
45. Sarras, M. Jr., Yan, L., Grens, A., Zhang, X., Agbas, A., Huff, J., St. John, P. and Abrahamson, D. (1994). Cloning and biological function of laminin in Hydra vulgaris. Dev. Biol. 164, 312-324.
46. Schunck B, Kraft W, Truyen U. (1995). A simple touch-down polymerase chain reaction for the detection of canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus in feces. J. Virol Methods. 55, 427-433.
47. Shenk, M. A, Gee, L., Steele, R. E. and Bode, H. R. (1993b). Expression of Cnox-2, a HOM/HOX gene, is suppressed during head formation in hydra. Dev. Biol. 160, 108-118.
48. Shenk, M. A., Bode, H. R. and Steele, R. E. (1993a). Expression of Cnox-2, a HOM/HOX homeobox gene in hydra, is correlated with axial pattern formation. Development 117, 657-667.
49. Smith, K. M., Gee, L., Blitz, I. L. and Bode, H. R. (1999). CnOtx, a member of the Otx gene family, has a role in cell movement in Hydra. Dev. Biol. 212, 392-404.
50. Stachel, S. E., Grunwald, D. J. and Myers, P. Z. (1993). Lithium perturbation and goosecoid expression identify a dorsal specification pathway in the pregastrula zebrafish. Development 117, 1261-1274.
51. Struhl, G., Struhl, K. and Macdonald, P. M. (1989). The gradient morphogen hicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator. Cell 1989, 57, 1259-1273.
52. Swofford, D. L. (1993). PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. [Computer programm distributed by Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL].
53. Technau, U. and Bode, H. R. (1999). Hybra1, a Brachyury homologue, acts during head formation in Hydra. Development 126, 999-1010.
54. Technau, U. and Holstein, T. W. (1995). Head formation in Hydra is different at apical and basal levels. Development 121, 1273-1282.
55. Thisse, C., Thisse, B., Halpern, M. E. and Postlethwait, J. H. (1994). Goosecoid expression in neurectoderm and mesendoderm is disrupted in zebrafish cyclops gastrulas. Dev. Biol. 164, 420-409.
56. Watrin, F. and Wolgemuth, D. J. (1993). Conservation and divergence of patterns of expression and lineage-specific transcripts in orthologues and paralogues of the mouse Hox-1.4 gene. Dev. Biol. 156, 136-145.
57. Webster, G. (1966). Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. II. Factors controlling hypostome formation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 16, 105-122.
58. Webster, G. and Wolpert, L. (1966). Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. I. Regional differences in time required for hypostome determination. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 16, 91-104.
59. Wilson, D., Sheng, G., Lecuit, T., Dostatni, N. and Desplan, C. (1993). Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA. Genes Dev. 7, 2120-2134.
60. Wilson, R. et al. (1994). 2.2 Mb of contiguous nucleotide sequence from chromosome III of C. elegans. Nature 368, 32-38.
61. Yamanaka, Y., Mizuno, T., Sasai, Y., Kishi, M., Hiroyuki, T., Cheol-Hee, K., Hibi, M. and Hirano, T. (1998). A novel homeobox gene, dharma, can induce the organizer in a non-cell-autonomous manner. Genes Dev. 12, 2345-2353.
62. Yao, T. (1945). Studies on the organizer problem in Pelmatohydra oligactis. I. The induction potency of the implants and the nature of the induced hydranth. J. Ezp. Biol. 21, 147-150.