메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 479-506

Physician peer review: Serving the patient or the physician?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LAW SUIT; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

EID: 0033399149     PISSN: 01947648     EISSN: 1521057X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01947649909511102     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (5)

References (15)
  • 1
    • 57349196841 scopus 로고
    • Construction and Application of Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986
    • Smith and Annotation. 1994. Construction and Application of Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. A.L.R. Fed., 121:255
    • (1994) A.L.R. Fed. , vol.121 , pp. 255
    • Smith1    Annotation2
  • 2
    • 0000474426 scopus 로고
    • Medical Peer Review: How Is It Protected by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986?
    • Darricades. 1992. Medical Peer Review:How Is It Protected by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986?. J. Contemp. L., 18:263
    • (1992) J. Contemp. L. , vol.18 , pp. 263
    • Darricades1
  • 3
    • 0008904434 scopus 로고
    • The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: A Proposal for Interpretation of Its Protection
    • Joy. 1989. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986:A Proposal for Interpretation of Its Protection. St. Mary's L.J., 20:955956
    • (1989) St. Mary's L.J. , vol.20 , pp. 956
    • Joy1
  • 4
    • 0008953621 scopus 로고
    • Structuring Peer Review to Minimize Antitrust Risk after Patrick
    • Busey. 1989. Structuring Peer Review to Minimize Antitrust Risk after Patrick. Antitrust, 3:12
    • (1989) Antitrust , vol.3 , pp. 12
    • Busey1
  • 5
    • 85025331217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • also Sentinel Event Policy and Procedure
    • also Sentinel Event Policy and Procedure, http://www.jcaho.org/sentinel/se.pp.htm (http://www.jcaho.org/sentinel/se.pp.htm)
  • 6
    • 0008927034 scopus 로고
    • Understanding and Defending Against Medical Professional Peer Review Antitrust Claims
    • Warner. 1994. Understanding and Defending Against Medical Professional Peer Review Antitrust Claims. U. Balt. L. Rev., 22:269270
    • (1994) U. Balt. L. Rev. , vol.22 , pp. 270
    • Warner1
  • 7
    • 0027570002 scopus 로고
    • The Antitrust Laws and the Medical Peer Review Process
    • Hammack. 1993. The Antitrust Laws and the Medical Peer Review Process. J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y, 9:419
    • (1993) J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y , vol.9 , pp. 419
    • Hammack1
  • 8
    • 0008932510 scopus 로고
    • Medical Peer Review
    • Blum. 1988. Medical Peer Review. J. Legal Educ., 38:525526
    • (1988) J. Legal Educ. , vol.38 , pp. 526
    • Blum1
  • 9
    • 0008925427 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The New Rules of Show and Tell: Identifying and Protecting the Peer Review and Medical Committee Privileges
    • Friend, Rangel, Finch and Storm. 1997. The New Rules of Show and Tell:Identifying and Protecting the Peer Review and Medical Committee Privileges. Baylor L. Rev., 49:607609
    • (1997) Baylor L. Rev. , vol.49 , pp. 609
    • Friend1    Rangel2    Finch3    Storm4
  • 10
    • 0001021336 scopus 로고
    • Confidentiality and Privilege of Peer Review Information: More Imagined than Real
    • Scheutzow and Gillis. 1993. Confidentiality and Privilege of Peer Review Information:More Imagined than Real. J.L. & Health, 7:169175
    • (1993) J.L. & Health , vol.7 , pp. 175
    • Scheutzow1    Gillis2
  • 11
    • 0001019068 scopus 로고
    • The Medical Review Committee Privilege: A Jurisdictional Survey
    • Creech. 1988. The Medical Review Committee Privilege:A Jurisdictional Survey. N.C.L. Rev., 67:179
    • (1988) N.C.L. Rev. , vol.67 , pp. 179
    • Creech1
  • 12
    • 0008960466 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Criminal Cases Stifle Peer Review, Physicians Charge
    • June 29
    • Prager. 1998. Criminal Cases Stifle Peer Review, Physicians Charge. Am. Med. News, 41 June 29:26
    • (1998) Am. Med. News , vol.41 , pp. 26
    • Prager1
  • 13
    • 0008904560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Potent Weapon: Federal Peer Review Immunity Under HCQIA
    • Baxter. 1997. A Potent Weapon:Federal Peer Review Immunity Under HCQIA. Defense Counsel J., 64:364
    • (1997) Defense Counsel J. , vol.64 , pp. 364
    • Baxter1
  • 14
    • 4243665721 scopus 로고
    • U.S. Databank Tracks Medical Malpractice
    • Nov. 29
    • 1989. U.S. Databank Tracks Medical Malpractice. San Fran. Chron., Nov. 29:A6
    • (1989) San Fran. Chron. , pp. A6
  • 15
    • 85025356266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Second year law student, Southern Illinois University School of Law. Address correspondence to Matthew J. Cate at Lesar Law Building, c/o Law Journal Office, Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale, Illinois 62901.
    • Second year law student, Southern Illinois University School of Law. Address correspondence to Matthew J. Cate at Lesar Law Building, c/o Law Journal Office, Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale, Illinois 62901.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.