Clinical experience with flow cytometric separation of human X- and Y- chromosome bearing sperm

Theriogenology

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1435-1440

  Fugger, E F ^a,b  

^a GENETICS AND IVF INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Flow cytometric separation; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Human sperm; MicroSort

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL; BREEDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX RATIO; SPERMATOZOON; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; DNA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MALE; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES; SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS); SEX PRESELECTION; SEX RATIO; SPERMATOZOA; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

EID: 0033397108     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00228-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Chen MJ, Guu HF, Ho ESC. Efficiency of sex pre-selection of spermatozoa by albumin separation method evaluated by double-labelled fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1920-1926.
2. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999;71;684-689.
3. Ericsson RJ. Sex selection via albumin columns: 20 years of results. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1787-1788.
4. Flaherty SP, Matthews CD. Application of modern molecular techniques to evaluate sperm sex selection methods. Hum Reprod 1996;2:937-942.
5. Flaherty SP, Michalowska J, Swann JJ, Dmowski WP, Matthews CD, Aitken RJ. Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1997:12;938-942.
6. Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after microSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2367-2370.
7. Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. Sixth Annual Report, Donor insemination data, London UK 1997;p 27.
8. Johnson LA, Welch GR, Keyvanfar K, Dorfmann, A, Fugger EF, Schulman JD. Gender preselection in humans? Flow cytometric separation of X and Y spermatozoa for the prevention of X-linked diseases. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1733-1739.
9. Levinson G, Keyvanfar K, Wu JC, Fugger EF, Fields RA, Harton GL, Palmer FT, Sisson ME, Starr KM, Dennison-Lagos L, Calvo L, Sherins RJ, Bick D, Schulman JD. DNA based X-enriched sperm separation as an adjunct to preimplantation genetic testing for the prevention of X-linked disease. Mol Hum Reprod 1; Hum Reprod 1995;10:979-982.
10. Reubinoff BE, Schenker JG. New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1996;66:343-350.
11. Rose RG, Wong A. Experiences in Hong Kong with the theory and practice of the albumin column method of sperm separation for sex selection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:146-149.
12. Vidal F, Fugger EF, Blanco J, Keyvanfar K, Catala V, Norton M, Hazelrigg WB, Black SH, Levinson G, Egozcue J, Schulman JD. Efficiency of MicroSort flow cytometry for producing sperm populations enriched in X- or Y-chromosome haplotypes: A blind trial assessed by double and triple colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:308-312.
13. Vidal F, Moragas M, Catala V, Torello MJ, Santalo J, Calderon G, Gimenez C, Barri PN, Egozcue J, Veiga A. Sephadex filtration and human serum albumin gradients do not select spermatozoa by sex chromosome: A fluorescent in-situ hybridization study. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1740-1743.