Native people and the environmental regime in the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement

Arctic

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 395-410

  Peters, Evelyn J ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Environmental assessment; James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement; Land claim agreements; Subsistence economies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033395897     PISSN: 00040843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14430/arctic944     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. BARROW, C.J. 1997. Environmental and social impact assessment: An introduction. New York: Arnold.
2. BEANLANDS, G.E., and DUINKER, P.N. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Ottawa: Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office.
3. BERGER, T.R. 1985. Village journey: The report of the Alaska Native Review Commission. New York: Hill and Wang.
4. BOURASSA, R. 1985. Power From the North. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada.
5. BRASCOUPÉ, S. 1993. Strengthening traditional economies and perspectives. In: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Sharing the harvest: The road to self-reliance. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada. 101-119.
6. BRODY, H. 1983. Maps and dreams: A journey into the lives and lands of the Beaver Indians of Northwest Canada. New York: Penguin Books.
7. BROOKE, L.F. 1995. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Experiences of the Nunavik Inuit with wildlife management. Ottawa: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
8. BURGER, J. 1987. Report from the frontier: The state of the world's indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books Ltd.
9. CANADA. CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL (CEARC). 1985. Social impact assessment: A research prospectus. Ottawa: CEARC Secretariat.
10. CANADA. FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW OFFICE. 1986. Federal environmental assessment and review process: Initial assessment guide. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services.
11. CANADA, QUEBEC. 1976. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Montreal: Editeur officiel du Québec.
12. CANADIAN WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC. V. CANADA (MINISTER OF THE ENVIRONMENT) [1989] 3 F.C. 309.
13. CIACCIA, THE HON. J. 1976. Opening remarks to the standing parliamentary committee of the National Assembly of Quebec convened to examine the Agreement with the James Bay Crees and the Inuit of Quebec prior to its signature, 5 November, 1975. In: The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Montreal: Editeur officiel du Québec, xi-xxiv.
14. CORBETT, R. 1986. A bargaining and community development approach to social impact assessment and management. Unpublished Master's thesis, Faculty of Environmental Design, The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
15. CREE REGIONAL AUTHORITY V. ROBINSON [1991] 2 C.N.L.R. 41 (F.C.T.D.) March 13, 1991.
16. CREE REGIONAL AUTHORITY V. ROBINSON [1991] 4 C.N.L.R. 84 (F.C.T.D.) September 10, 1991.
17. DAY, J.C., and QUINN, F. 1992. Water diversion and export: Learning from Canadian experience. Waterloo: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo.
18. ELIAS, P.D., and WEINSTEIN, M.S. 1992. Development and the Indian people of Fort Ware: Predicting and managing consequences. Unpublished study for the Kaska Dene Council and the Community of Fort Ware. Ottawa: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Library.
19. EVALUATING COMMITTEE, KATIVIK ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION, FEDERAL REVIEW COMMITTEE NORTH OF THE 55TH PARALLEL, FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PANEL. 1992. Guidelines: Environmental impact statement for the proposed Great Whale River hydroelectric project. Montreal: Great Whale Public Review Support Office.
20. FEIT, H. 1980. Protecting indigenous hunters' ways of life: The social and environmental protection regime in the James Bay and Northern Quebec Aboriginal Rights Agreement. Unpublished paper presented at The Conference on Social Impacts of Natural Resource Development on Indigenous Peoples, Ithaca, New York, 19-20 August 1980.
21. _. 1988. The power and the responsibility: Implementation of the wildlife and hunting provisions of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. In: Vincent, S., and Bowers, G., eds. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Ten years after. Montreal: Recherches amérindiennes au Québec. 74-88.
22. _. 1989. James Bay Cree self-governance and land management. In: Wilmsen, E.N., ed. We are here: Politics of aboriginal land tenure. Berkeley: University of California Press. 68-98.
23. FRIENDS OF THE OLDMAN RIVER SOCIETY v. CANADA (MINISTER OF TRANSPORT) [1992] 1 S.C.R. 3.
24. GAGNON, C., HIRSCH, P., and HOWITT, R. 1993. Can SIA empower communities? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 13:229-252.
25. GRAND COUNCIL OF THE CREES (OF QUEBEC). 1991. Submission to the Cree-Naskapi Commission Community Tour, March 9. Ottawa: Cree-Naskapi Commission.
26. GRAND COUNCIL OF THE CREES (OF QUEBEC) and THE CREE REGIONAL AUTHORITY. 1987. Annual Report. Montreal: Grand Council of the Crees (of Quebec) and the Cree Regional Authority.
27. _. 1995. Annual Report. Montreal: Grand Council of the Crees (of Quebec) and the Cree Regional Authority.
28. GREAT WHALE PUBLIC REVIEW SUPPORT OFFICE. 1992. Background information: Guidelines for the environmental impact statement for the proposed Great Whale River hydroelectric project. Montreal: Great Whale Public Review Support Office.
29. HODGINS, B.W., and CANNON, K.A. 1995. On the land: Confronting the challenges to aboriginal self-determination in northern Quebec and Labrador. Toronto: Betelgeuse Books.
30. HYDRO-QUEBEC v. A.-G. CANADA ET AL. [1991] 3 C.N.L.R. 41 (Quebec Court of Appeal) March 28, 1991.
31. JACOBS, P., and KEMP, W.B. 1987. New institutions and land-use planning in northern Quebec. In: Hinterland or homeland? Land-use planning in northern Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Arctic Resources Committee.
32. JULL, P. 1988. Behind the headlines: Canada, Arctic peoples and international affairs. Toronto: Canadian Institute of International Affairs.
33. KAYAHNA TRIBAL AREA COUNCIL. 1985. The Kayahna Region land utilization and occupancy study. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34. LaRUSIC, I.E. 1979. Negotiating a way of life: Initial Cree experience with the administrative structures arising from the James Bay Agreement. Ottawa: Research Division, Policy, Research and Evaluation Group, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.
35. MAINVILLE, R. 1991. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Unpublished paper presented at The Canadian Institute of Resources Law Fifth Conference on Resources Law, May 9-11. Ottawa: The Canadian Institute of Resources Law.
36. MULVIHILL, P.R., and KEITH, R.F. 1989. Institutional requirements for adaptive EIA: The Kativik Environmental Quality Commission. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 9:399-412.
37. NOTZKE, C. 1994. Aboriginal peoples and natural resources in Canada. North York: Captus University Publications.
38. NUTTALL, M. 1994. Greenland: Emergence of an Inuit homeland. In: Minority Rights Group, eds. Polar peoples: Self-determination and development. London: Minority Rights Publications. 1-28.
39. PENN, A. 1988. Comments. In: Vincent, S., and Bowers, G., eds. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Ten years after. Montreal: Recherches amérindiennes au Québec. 127-131.
40. _. 1995. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Natural resources, public lands, and the implementation of a Native land claim settlement. Ottawa: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
41. PETERS, E.J. 1989. Federal and provincial responsibilities for the James Bay Cree, Naskapi and Inuit under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and the Northeastern Quebec Agreement. In: Hawkes, D.C., ed. Aboriginal peoples and government responsibility: Exploring federal and provincial roles. Ottawa: Carleton University Press. 173-242.
42. POSLUNS, M. 1993. Voices from the Odeyak. Toronto: NC Press Limited.
43. PROVINCIAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (COMEX), ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT REVIEW PANEL NORTH OF THE 55TH PARALLEL (COFEX-NORTH), ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT REVIEW PANEL SOUTH OF THE 55TH PARALLEL (COFEX-SOUTH), FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PANEL (FEARP) OF THE PROPOSED GREAT WHALE PROJECT, and KATIVIK ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION (KEQC), 1994. Joint report on the conformity and quality of the environmental impact statement for the proposed Great Whale River hydroelectric project. Montreal: Great Whale Public Review Support Office.
44. REED, M.G. 1990. Environmental assessment and aboriginal claims: Implementation of the Inuvialuit Final Agreement. Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.
45. RICHARDSON, B. 1975. Strangers devour the land. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada.
46. ROSS, H. 1990. Community social impact assessment: A framework for indigenous peoples. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 10:185-193.
47. SALISBURY, R.F. 1986. A homeland for the Cree: Regional development in James Bay 1971-1981. Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
48. SHAPCOTT, C. 1989. Environmental impact assessment and resource management, a Haida case study: Implications for Native people of the North. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies. 9(1):55-83.
49. SIMON, M. 1992. Environments, sustainable development and self-government. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 16(1-2):21-26.
50. STEA, D., and WISNER, B. 1984. Introduction. Antipode 16(2): 3-13.
51. TESTER, F.J. 1992. Reflections on Tin Wis: Environmentalism and the evolution of citizen participation in Canada. Alternatives 19(1):34-41.
52. VOINSON, M. 1988. The agreement: A possible vehicle of emancipation or a strategy for subjection? In: Vincent, S., and Bowers, G., eds. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Ten years after. Montreal: Recherches amérindiennes au Québec. 292-293.
53. WEINSTEIN, M. S., TANNER, A., USHER, P., and DENTON, D. 1992. Great Whale River Project. Environment review: Social impact panel. Unpublished testimony on behalf of the Grand Council of the Crees (of Quebec): Presentation of the Social Impacts Panel. Available at Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Library, Ottawa.
54. WILKINSON, P.F., and VINCELLI, M. 1995. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: An evaluation of the implementation of its environmental regimes. Ottawa: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
55. YERGEAU, M. 1988. The boldness of the agreement in environmental matters. In: Vincent, S., and Bowers, G., eds. James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement: Ten years after. Montreal: Recherches amérindiennes au Québec. 296.
56. YOUNG, E. 1995. Third World in the First: Development and indigenous Peoples. New York: Routledge.