Correlation of tensile strength with bursting pressure in the evaluation of intestinal anastomosis

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 478-485

  Ikeuchi, Daisuke ^a   Onodera, Hisashi ^a   Aung, Tun ^a   Kan, Shugen ^a   Kawamoto, Kazuyuki ^a   Imamura, Masayuki ^a   Maetani, Shunzo ^b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Tenri Institute of Medical Research   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anastomotic strength; Bowel anastomosis; Bursting pressure; Tensile strength

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS DEHISCENCE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; CORRELATION FUNCTION; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; RAT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TENSILE STRENGTH; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0033394119     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000018773     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hunt TK, Anders CJ: Standards for wound healing research. Surgery 1973;73:153.
2. Hendriks T, Mastboom WJB: Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses: Parameters for repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:891-901.
3. Waninger J, Kaufmann GW, Shah IA, Farthmann FH: Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonie anastomoses. Am J Surg 1992;163:319-323.
4. Nelson TS, Anders CJ: Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength. Arch Surg 1966; 93:309.
5. Snedcor GW, Cochran GW: Statistical Methods, ed 6. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1967.
6. Bluett MK, Healy DA, Kalemeris GC, O'Leary JP: Experimental evaluation of staple lines in gastric surgery. Arch Surg 1987;122:772-776.
7. De Waard JWD, Wobbes T, de Man BM, van der Lindn CJ, Hendriks T: Postoperative levamisole may compromise early healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Br J Cancer 1995;72:456-460.
8. Senn N: Enterorrhaphy: Its history, technique, and present status. JAMA 1893;21:215-235.
9. Lembert A: Mémoire sur l'entérorraphie avec la description d'un procédé nouveau pour pratiquer cette opération chirurgicale. Répertoire général d'anatomie et de physiologie pathologique et des cliniques chirurgicales 1826;2:100-107.
10. Ballantyne GH: The experimental basis of intestinal suturing. Effect of surgical technique inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:61-71.
11. Getzen LC, Roe RD, Holloway CI: Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;123:1219.
12. Mactani S: Comparative studies of intestinal anastomoses. J Jpn Surg Soc 1974;75:612-622.
13. Mactani S, Kasiwara S, Kuramoto S: Submucosal apposition with vertical mattress suture in intestinal anastomoses. Chir Gastroenterol 1975;9:363-369.
14. Halsted WS: Circular suture of the intestine: An experimental study. Am J Med Sci 1884;94: 436-461.
15. Nishikawa T, Masuda Y, Hirose M, Yoshida Y, Kimura K, Maruoka Y, Iijima Y, Maetani S, Tobe T: Which is stronger, mechanical stapling or Gambee stitch? Comparison under equal conditions. Geka Chiryo 1985;52:598-599.
16. Gambee LP: A single-layer open intestinal anastomosis applicable to the small as well as the large intestine. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol 1951:59:1-5.
17. Hasegawa M, Taebum P, Ikeuchi D, Onodera H, Imamura M, Maetani M: Everting mucosa-to-mucosa stapling of the bowel: Why is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:40.
18. Jonsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfelds B: Breaking strength of small intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1983;145:800-803.
19. Maetani S: Physical and biological unions of intestinal anastomotic wounds. Shujutsu 1987; 41:247-251.
20. Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B: Healing of experimental colonie anastomoses. II. Breaking strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis. Am J Surg 1978;136:595-599.