Resistance responses of plants regenerated from tomato anther and somatic tissue cultures to clavibacter michiganense subsp. michiganense

Israel Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 237-243

  Sotirova, Violeta ^a   Shtereva, Lydia ^a   Zagorska, Nedjalka ^a   Dimitrov, Boyan ^a   Bogatsevska, Nevena ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY   (Bulgaria)

^b INSTITUTE OF SOIL SCIENCE   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHER CULTURE; CULTIVAR; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GAMETOCLONAL VARIATION; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; REGENERATION; SOMACLONAL VARIATION; TOMATO;

BACTERIAL DISEASE; DISEASE RESISTANCE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CLAVIBACTER MICHIGANENSE; CLAVIBACTER MICHIGANENSIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0033393338     PISSN: 07929978     EISSN: 22238980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07929978.1999.10676779     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barden, K. A., Smith, S. S., and Murakishi, H. H., 1986. Regeneration and screening of tomato somaclones for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Sci., 45:209–213.
2. De Jong, R., and Homna, S., 1976. Evaluation of screening technique and determination of criteria for assessing resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in tomato. Euphytica, 25:405–414.
3. Daub, M. E., and Jenns, A. E., 1989. Field and greenhouse analysis of variation for disease resistance in tobacco somaclones. Phytopathology, 79:600–605.
4. Dumbar, K. B., and Stephens, C. T., 1989. An in vitro screen for detecting resistance in Pelargonium somaclones to bacterial blight in Geranium. Plant Dis. 73, 11:910–912.
5. Evans, D. A., 1984. Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Am. J. Bot., 71:759–774.
6. Evenor, D., Pressman, F., Ben-Yephet, V., and Rappoport, L., 1994. Somaclonal variation in celery and selection by coculturing toward resistance to Septoria apicola. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 39:203–210.
7. Gitaitis, R. D., Beaver, R. W., and Volodudakis, H. P., 1991. Detection of Clavibacter michiganense subsp. michi-ganense in symptomless tomato transplants. Plant Dis. 75, 8:834–838.
8. Gleasm, M. L., Gitaitis, R. D., and Ricker, M. D., 1993. Recent progress in understanding and controlling bacterial canker of tomato in Eastern North America. Plant Dis. 77, 11:1069–1071.
9. Hammerschlag, F. A., 1990. Resistance response of plant regenerated from peach callus cultures to Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 115:1034–1037.
10. Lakin, G. F., 1990. Biometrics. Vishaia shkola, Moscow, 350 pp. (in Russian).
11. Laterrot, H., 1974. Value of the resistance of the tomato Bulgarian 8/12 to Corynebacterium michiganense (Smith) Jensen. EUCARPIA of Tomato Working Group, Bari, Italy 144–149.
12. Laterrot, H., Brand, R., and Duanay, M. C., 1978. La resistance a Corynebacterium michiganense chez la tomate. Ann. Amelior. Plantes, 28:579–591.
13. Lindhout, P., and Purimahua, C., 1989. Investigations on tomato breeding for resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense. In:Book of poster abstracts. Part II, 12th EUCARPIA Cong. Sci. Plant Breed., Göttingen, Germany.
14. Lörz, H., 1984. “ Variability in tissue culture derived plants. In ”. In Genetic manipulation:Impact on man and society Edited by:Arber, W., 103–114. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
15. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15:473–197.
16. Scowcroft, W. R., Brettell, R., Ryan, S., Davies, P., and Palota, M., 1987. “ Somaclonal variation and genomic flux ”. In Plant tissue and cell culture, Alan R. Liss, New York Edited by:Green, C. E., Lamers, D. A., Hackett, W. P., and Biesboer, D. D., 275–286. 1987
17. Shahin, E. A., and Spiviey, R., 1987. “ In vitro breeding for disease resistance in tomato ”. In Tomato biotechnology, Alan R. Liss, New York Edited by:Nevins, D. J., and Jones, R. A., 89–97.
18. Shtereva, L., Zagorska, N., Dimitrov, B., Kruleva, M., and Oanh, K., 1998. Induced androgenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). II. Factors affecting induction of androgenesis. Plant Cell Rep., 17:312–317.
19. Smith, S. S., and Murakishi, H. H., 1987. Inheritance of resistance to tomato mosaic virus (ToMV-0) in tomato somaclones. TGC Rep., 37:65–66.
20. Sotirova, V., 1991. Resistance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) to bacterial disease. D.Sc. thesis, Institute of Genetics, Sofia (in Bulgarian).
21. Sotirova, V., Bogatsevska, N., and Stamova, L., 1993. Influence of different non-specific plants on phenotype and pathogenicity of Clavibacter michiganense subsp. michiganense. Proc. 12th EUCARPIA Meeting of Tomato Genetics and Breeding, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 27–31 July 39–43.
22. Stamova, L., 1987. Resistance of tomato to diseases. D.Sc. thesis, Institute of Vegetables, “Maritza”, Plovdiv (in Bulgarian).
23. Toyoda, H., Shimizu, K., Chatani, K., Kita, N., Matsuda, Y., and Ouchi, S., 1989. Selection of bacterial wilt resistant tomato through tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep., 8:317–320.
24. Van den Bulk, R. W., 1991. Application of cell and tissue culture and in vitro selection for disease resistance breeding. Euphytica, 56:259–286.
25. Van Steekelenburg, N. A.M., 1985. Resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in tomato genotypes. Euphytica, 34:245–250.
26. Wright, J. C., and Lacy, M. L., 1988. Increase of disease resistance in celery cultivars by regeneration of whole plants from cell suspension culture. Plant Dis., 72:256–259.
27. Zagorska, N., Shtereva, L., Dimitrov, B., and Kruleva, M., 1998. Induced androgenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) I. Influence of genotype on androgenetic ability. Plant Cell Rep., 17:968–973.