Effect of ploidy level on fruit morphology, seed germination and juvenile growth in scurvy grass (Cochlearia officinalis L. s.l., Brassicaceae)

Plant Species Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 201-215

  Pegtel, Dick M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

C. anglica L.; C. danica x C; C. officinalis L. s.s.; C. pyrenaica DC.; C. x hollandica Henrard; Cytotypes; Evolution; Germination; Growth; Hybrid vigor; Hybridization; Officinalis s.s.; Polyploidization

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME NUMBER; DIPLOIDY; FRUIT; GERMINATION; HETEROSIS; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; MORPHOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PLANT GROWTH; PLOIDY; POLYPLOIDY; SEED WEIGHT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TEMPERATURE; TETRAPLOIDY;

COCHLEARIA OFFICINALIS;

EID: 0033391993     PISSN: 0913557X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-1984.1999.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Allen D. E. (1966) A list of infraspecific taxa of British phanerogams tested in cultivation. Watsonia 6: 205-215.
2. Anderson E. (1949) Introgressive Hybridization. John Wiley, New York.
3. Anderson E. (1953) Introgressive hybridization. Biological Review 28: 28-307.
4. Barber H. N. (1970) Hybridization and evolution of plants. Taxon 19: 154-160.
5. Beeftink W. (1975) The ecological significance of embankment and drainage with respect to the vegetation of the South-West Netherlands. Journal of Ecology 63: 423-458.
6. Bradshaw A. D. (1962) The taxonomic problems of local geographical variation in plant species. Systematics Association Publication 4: 7-16.
7. Briggs D. & Walters S. M. (1984) Plant Variation and Evolution, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Cacco G., Ferrari G. & Lucci G. C. (1976) Uptake efficiency of roots in plants at different ploidy levels, Journal of Agricultural Science 87: 585-589.
9. Chater A. O. & Heywood V. H. (1964) Cochlearia L. In: Flora Europaea, Vol 1 (eds T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb) pp. 314-315, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Clapham A. R., Tutin T. G. & Warburg E. F. (1962) Flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Clark C. (1975) Ecogeographic races of Lesquerella engelmannii (Cruciferae): Distribution, chromosome numbers and taxonomy. Brittonia 27: 263-278.
12. Crane M. B. & Gairdner A. E. (1923) Species-crosses in Cochlearia, with a preliminary account of their cytology. Journal of Genetics 13: 187-200.
13. Davis T. A. W. (1976) Cochlearia danica L. × C officinalis L in Pembrokeshire. Watsonia 11: 178.
14. De Wet J. M. (1971) Polyploidy and evolution in plants. Taxon 20: 29-35.
15. De Wet J. M. (1980) Origins of polyploids. In: Polyploidy, Biological Relevance (ed. W. H. Lewis) pp. 3-16, Plenum Press, New York.
16. Ehrendorfer F. (1980). Polyploidy and distribution. In: Polyploidy, Biological Relevance (ed. W. H. Lewis) pp. 45-60. Plenum Press, New York.
17. Elkington T. T. (1984) Cytogenetic variation in the British Flora: Origins and significance. New Phytologist 98: 101-118.
18. Eriksen A. B. & Nordal I. (1989) Ecotypic differentiation in relation to soil nitrogen in Northern Scandinavian Cochlearia officinalis. Holarctic Ecology 12: 31-38.
19. Fearn G. M. (1977) A morphological and cytological investigation of Cochlearia populations on the Gower peninsula. Glamorgan New Phytologist 79: 455-458.
20. Gadella Th. W. J. (1983) Enkele floristische en cytotaxonomische waarnemingen op Schiermonnikoog. Gorteria 11: 227-229.
21. Garbutt K. & Bazzaz F. A. (1983) Leaf demography, flower production and biomass of diploid and tetraploid populations of Phlox drummondii Hook on a soil moisture gradient. New Phytologist 93: 129-141.
22. Gill J. J. B. (1965) Diploids in the genus Cochlearia. Watsonia 6: 188-189.
23. Gill J. J. B. (1971) Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. The chromosomal homogeneity within both the 2n=12 diploids and the 2n=14 diploids and the cytogenetic relationship between the two chromosome levels. Annals of Botany 35: 947-956.
24. Gill J. J. B. (1973) Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae). The origin of C. officinalis L. and C. micacea Marshall. Genetica 44: 217-234.
25. Gill J. J. B. (1975) Cochlearia L. In: Hybridization and the Flora of the British Isles (ed. C.A. Stace) pp. 143-146, Academic Press, London.
26. Gill J. J. B. (1976) Cytogenetic studies in Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae). The chromosomal constitution of C. danica Genetica 46: 115-127.
27. Gill J. J. B., McAllister H. A. & Fearn G. M. (1978) Cytotaxonomic studies on the Cochlearia officinalis group from inland stations in Britain. Watsonia 12: 15-22.
28. Gottschalk W. (1976) Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Evolution der Pflanzen. Fischer, Stuttgart.
29. Grant V. (1965) Species hybrids and spontaneous amphiploids in the Gilia laciniata group. Heredity 20: 537-550.
30. Gupta P. P. (1981) Consequences of artificial and natural chromosome doubling on DNA, RNA and protein contents in Cochlearia (Brassicaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 138: 23-27.
31. Hancock J. F. (1992) Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
32. Heiser C. B. (1973) Introgression re-examined. Botanical Review 39: 347-366.
33. Henrard J. Th. (1914-1916) Cochlearia hollandica nova hybrida, (Cochlearia anglica × Cochlearia officinalis). In: Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis (ed. F. Fedde) 14, pp. 221. Bornträger, Berlin.
34. Henrard J. Th. (1915) Cochlearia hollandica mihi. Nederlands Kruidkundig Archief 1915: 200-203.
35. Heubl G. R. & Vogt R. (1985) Chemosystematische Studien in der Gattung Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae). Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 107: 177-194.
36. Jackson R. C. (1976) Evolution and systematic significance of polyploidy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 209-234.
37. Jackson R. C. (1982) Polyploidy and diploidy: New perspectives on chromosome pairing and its evolutionary implications. American Journal of Botany 69: 1512-1523.
38. Koch M., Hurka H. & Mummenhoff K. (1996) Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and RAPD-analyses in Cochlearia (Brassicaceae): Biosystematics and speciation. Nordic Journal of Botany 16: 585-603.
39. Koch M., Huthmann M. & Hurka H. (1998) Isozymes, speciation and evolution in the polyploid complex Cochlearia L. (Brassicaceae). Botanica Acta 111: 411-425.
40. Levin D. A. (1966) Hybridization and evolution in the Phlox pilosa complex. American Naturalist 100: 289-302.
41. Levin D. A. (1975) Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
42. Levin D. A. (1983) Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. American Naturalist 122: 1-15.
43. Lewis W. H. (1976) Temporal adaptation correlated with ploidy in Claytonia virginica. Systematic Botany 1: 340-347.
44. Lewis W. H. & Suda Y. (1976) Diploids and polyploids from a single species population: Temporal adaptatations. Journal of Heredity 67: 391-393.
45. Lövkvist B. (1963) Taxonomic problems in aneuploid complexes. Regnum Vegetabile 27: 51-57.
46. Lumaret R., Guillerm J. L., Delay J., Loufti A., Izco J. & Jay M. (1987) Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in Dactylis glomerata L. from Galicia (Spain). Oecologia 73: 436-446.
47. Mennema J. (1985) Echt lepelblad. In: Atlas van de Nederlandse flora. 2. Zeldzame en Vrij Zeldzame Planten (eds J. Mennema, A. J. Quené-Boterenbrood and C. L. en Plate) p. 119. Bohn, Scheltema en Holkema, Utrecht.
48. Meusel H., Jäger E. & Weinert E. (1965) Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Fischer, Jena.
49. Mooney H. A. & Johnson A. W. (1965) Comparative physiological ecology of an arctic and alpine population of Thalictrum alpinum L. Ecology 46: 721-727.
50. Mullenders W. (1967) Flore de la Belgique, du Nord de la France et des regions voisines. Desoer, Liège.
51. Nordal I. (1988) Cochlearia pyrenaica DC., a species new to Scotland. Watsonia 17: 49-52.
52. Nordal I., Eriksen A. B., Laane M. M. & Solberg Y. (1986) Biogeographic and biosystematic studies in the genus Cochlearia in Northern Scandinavia. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 27: 83-93.
53. Nordal I. & Laane M. M. (1990) Cytology and reproduction in arctic Cochlearia. Sommerfeltia 11: 147-158.
54. Nordal I. & Laane M. M. (1996) Taxonomic delimitation within Cochlearia officinalis s.lat. with particular discussion on the rank of C. anglica (Brassicaceae). Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 31: 47-57.
55. Nordal I. & Stabbetorp O. E. (1990) Morphology and taxonomy of the genus Cochlearia (Brassicaceae) in Northern Scandinavia. Nordic Journal of Botany 10: 249-263.
56. Rothera S. L. & Davy A. J. (1986) Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in Deschampsia cespitosa. New Phytologist 102: 449-467.
57. Saunte L. H. (1955) Cyto-genetical studies in the Cochlearia officinalis complex. Hereditas 41: 499-515.
58. Semple J. C. (1978) The cytogeography of Aster pilosus (Compositae): Ontario and the adjacent United States. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 159-186.
59. Simonsen O. (1975) Cytogenetic investigations in diploid and autotetraploid populations of Festuca pratensis. Hereditas 79: 73-108.
60. Smartt J. & Simmonds N. W. (1995) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow.
61. Smith H. E. (1946) Sedum pulchellum: A physiological and morphological comparison of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid races. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 73: 495-511.
62. Stace C. A. (ed.) (1975) Hybridization and the Flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London.
63. Stebbins G. L. (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of the American Phil. Society 103: 231-251.
64. Stebbins G. L. (1971) The morphological, physiological and cyto-genetic significance of polyploidy. In: Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants (ed. G. L. Stebbins) pp. 124-154. Arnold, London.
65. Stebbins G. L. (1980) Polyploidy in plants: Unsolved problems and prospects. In: Polyploidy, Biological Relevance (ed. W.H. Lewis) pp. 495-520. Plenum Press, New York.
66. Stebbins G. L. & Daly K. (1961) Changes in the variation pattern of a hybrid population over an eight-year period. Evolution 15: 60-71.
67. Tal M. (1980) Physiology of polyploids. In: Polyploidy: Biological Significance (ed. W. H. Lewis) pp. 61-75. Plenum Press, New York.
68. Thellung A. (1919) Cochlearia L. In: Illustrierte Flora Mitteleuropas IV (ed. G. Hegi) pp. 134-142. Carl Hanser, München.
69. van der Maarel E. (1962a) Aantekeningen over Cochlearia officinalis L. s.l. 1. Herbarium onderzoek van C. officinalis en C. anglica L. Gorteria 1: 75-79.
70. van der Maarel E. (1962b) Aantekeningen over Cochlearia officinalis L. s.l. 2. Populatie onderzoek van C. officinalis en C. anglica L. Gorteria 1. 86-90.
71. van der Meijden R. (1983) Heukel's Flora van Nederland, 20ste edn. Wolters-Noordhof, Groningen.
72. Vardi A. (1974) Introgression from tetraploid durum wheat to diploid Aegilops longissima and A. speltoides. Heredity 32: 171-181.
73. Vogt R. (1985) Die Cochlearia pyrenaica-Gruppe in Zentral Europa. Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 56: 5-52.
74. Vogt R. (1987) Die Gattung Cochlearia L. (Cruciferae) auf den Iberischen Halbinsel. Mitt Botany Staatssaml München 23: 393-421.
75. Vogt R. & Lippert L. (1988) Zur Verbreitung der Gattung Cochlearia L. in Bayern. Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 59: 133-135.
76. Yeo P. F. (1956) Hybridization between diploid and tetraploid species of Euphrasia. Watsonia 3: 253-269.
77. Zohary D. & Nur U. (1959) Natural triploid in the orchard grass, Dactylis glomerata L. polyploid complex and their significance for gene flow from diploid to tetraploid levels. Evolution 13: 311-317.