Developments in imaging. An historical review

Scottish Medical Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 180-185

  McMillan, N C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Digital future; Imaging developments; Interventional radiology

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; AORTA BIFURCATION; BIOPSY; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FUTUROLOGY; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; IONIZING RADIATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORPHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; REVIEW; TECHNIQUE; ULTRASOUND; X RAY;

EID: 0033389984     PISSN: 00369330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003693309904400610     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Making the best use of a department of Clinical Radiology 4 th Ed 1998, The Royal College of Radiologists.
2. Donald I, McVicar J, and Brown TG. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound. Lancet 1958(1); 1189-1194.
3. Robinson HP. Sonar measurement of foetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973;4:28-3 1.
4. Baxter GM, McKechnie S and Duffy P. Colour Doppler ultrasound in deep venous thrombosis: a comparison with venography. Clin Radiol 1990;42:3 2-3 6.
5. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; 46:1016-1022.
6. Ambrose J. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 2. Clinical applications. Br J Radiol 1973: 46:1023-1047.
7. Lauterbur P. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1973; 242:190-191.
8. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiologica (Stockholm) 1953; 39:368-376.
9. McFarland EG and Brink JA. Helical CT Colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability. AJR 1999; 173:549-559.
10. Meaney LFM, Johansson LOM, Affistrom H and Prince MR. Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999; 10:326-338.
11. Schoenberg SO., Bock M, Floemer F. et al. High-Resolution pulmonary arterioand venography using multiple-bolus multiphase 31)-Gd-MRA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999. 10:339-346.
12. Rigo R, Paulus R, Katschten BJ. et al. Oncological applications of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Eur J Nucl Med 1996. 23:1641-1674.
13. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Meltzer CC et al, Role of positron emission tomography in staging esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64(3):765-9.
14. Coates G and Skehan SJ. Emerging role of PET in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Can Respir J 1999; 6(2):145-152.
15. Gupta NC, Gracber GM, Rogers JS. 2nd, and Bishop HA Comparative efficacy of positron emission tomography with FDG and computed tomographic scanning in preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg 1999;229(2): 286-91
16. Gambhir SS, Roh CK, Phelps ME, Madar I and Maddahi J. Decision tree sensitivity for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1428-1436.
17. Strickland NH. Some cost benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. Br J Radiol 1996;69:1089-98.