Fistula in ano: Evaluation with low-field magnetic resonance imaging (0.1 T)

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 1999, Pages 1253-1256

  Madsen, Søren Martin ^a   Myschetzky, P S ^a   Heldmann, U ^a   Rasmussen, O ^a   Thomsen, H S ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Fistula in ano; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FISTULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033386192     PISSN: 00365521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/003655299750024797     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1. Haggett P, Moore N, Shearman J, Travis S, Jewell D, Mortensen N. Pelvic and perianal complications of Crohn's disease: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging. Gut 1995;36:407-10.
2. 2. Lunniss P, Barker P, Sultan A, Armstrong P, Reznek R, Bartram C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:708-18.
3. 3. Barker P, Lunniss P, Armstrong P, Reznek R, Cotton K, Phillips R. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula in ano: technique, interpretation and accuracy. Clin Radiol 1994;49:7-13.
4. 4. Lunniss P, Armstrong P, Barker P, Reznek R, Phillips R. Magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulae. Lancet 1992;340:394-6.
5. 5. Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ, Adams C, Ambrose NS. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:735-41.
6. 6. Beckingham I, Spencer J, Word J, Dyke G, Adams C, Ambrose N. Prospective evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fistula in ano. Br J Surg 1996;83:1396-8.
7. 7. Spencer J, Chapple K, Wilson D, Word J, Windsor A, Ambrose N. Outcome after surgery for perianal fistulae: predictive value of MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:403-6.
8. 8. Halligan S, Healy J, Bartram C. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano: STIR or SPIR? Br J Radiol 1998;71:141-5.
9. 9. Perini L, Marcon M, Bidoli L, Fabris G, Ferraro B, Cavallo A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of perianal fistula. Radiol Med (Torino) 1995;89:637-42.
10. 10. Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram C, Nicholls R. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991;78:445-7.
11. 11. Schratter-Sehn A, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, Schurawitzki H, Herold C, Schratter M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn's disease. Endoscopy 1993;25:582-6.
12. 12. Van Beers B, Grandin C, Kartheuser A, Hoang P, Mahieu P, Detry R, et al. MRI of complicated anal fistulae: comparison with digital examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:87-90.
13. 13. Stoker J, Lameris J. Endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1997;60:274-7.
14. 14. Hussain S, Stoker J, Schouten W, Hop W, Lameris J. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 1996;200:475-81.
15. 15. DeSouza N, Gilderdale D, Coutts G, Puni R, Steiner R. MRI of fistula-in-ano: a comparison of endoanal coil with external phased array coil techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:357-63.
16. 16. Halligan S, Bartram C. MR imaging of fistula in ano: are endoanal coils the gold standard? Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:407-12.