Dose-dependent effects but not sensitization of DRL 45-s performance by oral d-amphetamine with cumulative- and repeated-dosing regimens

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 739-746

  Lobarinas, E ^a   Falk, J L ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cumulative dosing; d amphetamine; DRL schedule; Rat; Sensitization; Timing performance

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG SENSITIZATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT;

EID: 0033385025     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199912000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Balcells-Olivero M, Richards JB, Seiden LS (1997). Sensitization to amphetamine on the differential-reinforcement-of low-rate 72-s schedule. Psychopharmacology, 133:207-213.
2. Blackman DE (1989). Behavioral tolerance and sensitization. Definitions and explanations. In: Psychoactive Drugs: Tolerance and Sensitization. Goudie AJ, Emmett-Oglesby MW (editors). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 521-545.
3. Bowen JA, Fowler SC, Kallman MJ (1993). Effects of variation in chronic dose of cocaine on contingent tolerance as assessed in a milk-drinking task. Psychopharmacology 113:67-75.
4. Campbell JC, Seiden LS (1973). Performance influence on the development of tolerance to amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:703-708.
5. Ellinwood EH Jr, Kilbey MM (1975). Amphetamine stereotypy: the influence of environmental factors and prepotent behavioral patterns on its topography and development. Biol Psychiatry 10:3-16.
6. Emmett-Oglesby MW (1995). Sensitization and tolerance to the motivational and subjective effects of psychostimulants. In: The Neurobiology of Cocaine: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. Hammer RP Jr (editor). New York: CRC Press, pp. 31-47.
7. Goudic AJ, Emmett-Ogleshy MW (1989). Tolerance and sensitization: overview. In: Psychoactive Drugs: Tolerance and Sensitization. Goudie AJ, Emmett-Oglesby MW (editors). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 1-13.
8. Hughes KM, Popi L, Wolgin DL (1998). Experiential constraints on the development of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia following sensitization of stereotypy: instrumental contingencies regulate the expression of sensitization. Psychopharmacology 140:445-449.
9. Jufer RA, Walsh SL, Cone EJ (1998). Cocaine and metabolite concentrations in plasma during repeated oral administration: development of a human laboratory model of chronic cocaine use. J Anal Toxicol 22:435-444.
10. Kalynchuk LE, Kippin TE, Pinel JPJ, McIntyre CP (1994). Dissipation of contingent tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of diazepam: effect of the criterion response. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 49:1113-1117.
11. Kilbey MM, Sannerud CA (1985). Models of tolerance: Do they predict sensitization to the effect of psychomotor stimulants. In: Behavioral Pharmacology: The Current Status. Seiden LS, Balster RL (editors). New York: Liss, pp. 295-321.
12. Kosman ME, Unna KR (1968). Effects of chronic administration of the amphetamines and other stimulants on behavior. Clin Pharmacol Ther 9:240-254
13. Kuhn CM, Schanberg SM (1978). Metabolism of amphetamine after acute and chronic administration to the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 207:544-554.
14. Lau CE, Ma F, Foster DM, Falk JL (19991. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the psychomotor stimulant effect of cocaine after intravenous administration: timing performance deficits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 288:535-543.
15. Lobarinas E, Lau CE, Falk JL (1999). Sensitization of operant behavior to oral cocaine with increasing- and repetitive-dose regimens. Behav Pharmacol 10:15-26.
16. Ma F, Falk JL, Lau CE (1999). Cocaine pharmacodynamics after intravenous and oral administration in rats: relation to pharmacokinetics. Psychopharmacology 144:323-332.
17. Nelson LR, Ellison G (19781. Enhanced stereotypies after repeated injections but not continuous amphetamines. Neuropharmacology 17: 1081-1084.
18. Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986). Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: A review and evaluation of animal models of amphelamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157-198.
19. Schenk S, Davidson ES (1998). Stimulant preexposure sensitizes rats and humans to the rewarding effects of cocaine. In: Laboratory Behavioral Studies of Vulnerability to Drug Abuse. Wetherington CL, Falk JL (editors). NIDA Research Monograph 169. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, pp. 56-82.
20. Schenk S, Partridge B (1997). Sensitization and tolerance in psychostimulant self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:543-550.
21. Schuster CR, Zimmerman J (1961). Timing behavior during prolonged treatment with dl-amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 4:327-330.
22. Schuster CR, Dockens WS, Woods JH (1966). Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacologia 9:170-182.
23. Segal DS, Schuckit MA (1983). Animal models of stimulantinduced psychosis. In: Stimulants: Neurochemical, Behavioral and Clinical Perspectives. Creese I (editor). New York: Raven Press, pp. 131-167.
24. Stewart J, Badiani A (1993). Tolerance and sensitization to the behavior effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 4:289-312.
25. Stolerman IP, Fink R, Jarvik ME (1974). Nicotine tolerance in rats. Role of dose and dose interval, Psychopharmacology 34:317-324.
26. Strakowski SM, Sax KW (1998). Progressive behavioral response to repeated d-amphelamine challenge: further evidence for sensitization in humans. Biol Psychiatry 44:1171-1177.
27. Wolgin DL, Hughes KM (1996). Effect of sensitization of stereotypy on the acquisition and retention of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia. Psychopharmacology 126:219-225.
28. Wolgin DL, Hughes KM (1997). Role of behavioral and pharmacological variables in the loss of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia. Psychopharmacology, 132:342-349.
29. Woolverton WL, Kandel D, Schuster CS (1978). Tolerance and cross-tolerance to cocaine and d-amphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 205:525-535.